Ep. 1892: Red Hot or Icy Blue? episode artwork

EPISODE · May 12, 2026 · 33 MIN

Ep. 1892: Red Hot or Icy Blue?

from Talking Real Money - Investing Talk · host Don McDonald

Don and Tom tackle the strange psychology of politics and investing, exploring how Republicans and Democrats consistently perceive the economy and markets differently depending on who occupies the White House. Drawing on research from Spencer Jakab, the University of Michigan, and Dimensional Fund Advisors, they argue that long-term market performance has historically shown little correlation to presidential party affiliation, despite investors’ emotional reactions. The episode also features a thoughtful listener discussion about pensions in public safety careers, including the hidden risks of not paying into Social Security and the limitations of pensions as wealth-building tools. Additional listener questions cover Vanguard target-date fund combinations and the drawbacks of holding a costly variable annuity inside an IRA. The show wraps with commentary on pay-to-play podcast awards, Don’s surprisingly modest Amazon book ranking triumph, and updates on his upcoming Civil War novel The Line Uncrossed which has been pre-released for podcast listeners in an exclusive ebook bonus package at donmcdonald.com0:05 Politics, perception, and the “presidential puzzle”2:26 Partisan views on the economy and stock market3:51 Why presidents have limited long-term market impact6:03 Emotions, investing, and politically themed ETFs8:18 Why asset allocation matters more than politics8:51 Performance of the MAGA ETF vs. expectations10:51 Listener question: pensions, Social Security, and public safety careers15:11 The importance of supplemental retirement savings alongside pensions16:38 Why pensions provide income but not generational wealth19:45 Listener question: mixing Vanguard Target Date 2035 and 2040 funds21:48 Debate over “rebalancing” target-date funds22:57 Listener question: variable annuity inside an IRA at Edward Jones24:28 Why variable annuities can be expensive and inefficient25:11 Fake podcast awards and pay-to-play recognition schemes27:07 “Financial Physics” Amazon ranking discussion28:32 Don’s upcoming novel The Line Uncrossed and Civil War inspirationQuestions? Comments? Click!

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 12, 2026

Embed this episode

Don and Tom tackle the strange psychology of politics and investing, exploring how Republicans and Democrats consistently perceive the economy and markets differently depending on who occupies the White House. Drawing on research from Spencer Jakab, the University of Michigan, and Dimensional Fund Advisors, they argue that long-term market performance has historically shown little correlation to presidential party affiliation, despite investors’ emotional reactions. The episode also features ...

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

Ready to play

Ep. 1892: Red Hot or Icy Blue?

0:00 33:33

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Talking Real Money - Investing Talk?

This episode is 33 minutes long.

When was this Talking Real Money - Investing Talk episode published?

This episode was published on May 12, 2026.

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this Talking Real Money - Investing Talk episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!