Skip to content
Reference Check episode artwork

EPISODE · Jan 19, 2025 · 1H 5M

Reference Check

from Divided Argument · host Will Baude & Dan Epps

In unpredictable fashion, we record a shockingly timely episode to reflect on the Court's hasty per curiam in the TikTok case. Along the way, we catch up on the shadow docket happenings, manage not to get derailed by an ethics discussion, discover a surprising opinion revision in real time, and break down the Court's opinion in Royal Canin U. S. A. v. Wullschleger. Most importantly, Dan—with help from loyal listeners—collects on a bet Will unwisely made years ago.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jan 19, 2025

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Reference Check

0:00 1:05:33

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Divided Argument?

This episode is 1 hour and 5 minutes long.

When was this Divided Argument episode published?

This episode was published on January 19, 2025.

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this Divided Argument episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!