EPISODE · Jan 19, 2025 · 1H 5M
Reference Check
from Divided Argument · host Will Baude & Dan Epps
In unpredictable fashion, we record a shockingly timely episode to reflect on the Court's hasty per curiam in the TikTok case. Along the way, we catch up on the shadow docket happenings, manage not to get derailed by an ethics discussion, discover a surprising opinion revision in real time, and break down the Court's opinion in Royal Canin U. S. A. v. Wullschleger. Most importantly, Dan—with help from loyal listeners—collects on a bet Will unwisely made years ago.
What this episode covers
In unpredictable fashion, we record a shockingly timely episode to reflect on the Court's hasty per curiam in the TikTok case. Along the way, we catch up on the shadow docket happenings, manage not to get derailed by an ethics discussion, discover a surprising opinion revision in real time, and break down the Court's opinion in Royal Canin U. S. A. v. Wullschleger. Most importantly, Dan—with help from loyal listeners—collects on a bet Will unwisely made years ago.
NOW PLAYING
Reference Check
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
Jun 16, 2026 ·34m
Jun 16, 2026 ·34m
Jun 16, 2026 ·18m
Jun 16, 2026 ·31m
Jun 16, 2026 ·21m
Jun 16, 2026 ·24m