Reframing Rights In Zimbabwe: Do Local Narratives Improve LGBTQ Rights Campaigning? episode artwork

EPISODE · May 7, 2026 · 37 MIN

Reframing Rights In Zimbabwe: Do Local Narratives Improve LGBTQ Rights Campaigning?

from UCL Uncovering Politics · host Alan Renwick, Phillip Ayoub, Adam Harris

In parts of the Global South, political elites have framed LGBTQ rights as a foreign, colonial agenda. So should advocates abandon universal rights language in favour of arguments rooted in local traditions and anti-colonial sentiment? A new study tests exactly this question using survey evidence from Zimbabwe — and finds clear support for the local approach. Host Alan Renwick is joined by the study's authors, Phillip Ayoub and Adam Harris, both Professors in the UCL Department of Political Science. Mentioned in this episode: Rooting Equality: Testing the Effectiveness of Activist Frames Combating Homophobia in Zimbabwe by Phillip M. Ayoub and Adam S. Harris, British Journal of Political Science.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 7, 2026

Embed this episode

This week we ask how LGBTQ advocates should respond when universal human rights claims are dismissed as Western colonial impositions.

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

Ready to play

Reframing Rights In Zimbabwe: Do Local Narratives Improve LGBTQ Rights Campaigning?

0:00 37:30

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of UCL Uncovering Politics?

This episode is 37 minutes long.

When was this UCL Uncovering Politics episode published?

This episode was published on May 7, 2026.

Can I download this UCL Uncovering Politics episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!