EPISODE · Apr 21, 2024 · 0 MIN
Rep. Grothman says 2nd public UAP hearing needed because "We don’t have the facts yet"
from Ask a Pol uaps · host Matt Laslo
Who?Glenn Grothman (R-WI) — Subcommittee chair, Oversight Committee LISTEN: Laslo & Grothman Ask a Pol asks:Any update on a second public UAP — aka UFO — hearing in the House Oversight Committee?Key Grothman: “No. We're gonna do something though,” Rep. Glenn Grothman exclusively tells Ask a Pol. ICYMI: Grothman chaired David Grusch hearing Follow-up:With the election drawing nearer and Congress’ plate full, is this issue falling off or because it's so bipartisan will it rise above election year politics? “No. We plan on doing it. It's not because it's bipartisan. We don’t have the facts yet, so we're gonna do something else about it,” Grothman tells us. Any donations go straight to Ask a Pol’s interns! Consider chipping in to support our independent journalism — Venmo, PayPal, Cash App — or just buy us a beer! Caught our ear:This interview was conducted the morning of the AARO SCIF briefing on UAPs, and Grothman doesn’t seem to have known about the classified meeting. ICYMI — Ask a Pol exclusives post-AARO SCIF brief Below find a rough transcript of Ask a Pol’s exclusive interview with Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI), slightly edited for clarity.TRANSCRIPT: Rep. Glenn Grothman SCENE: Grothman’s walking through the US Capitol when Ask a Pol’s Matt Laslo sees him, to his initial annoyance… Matt Laslo: “Hey, how you doing sir?”Glenn Grothman: “Good.” ML: “Are you going to that SCIF briefing today with AARO or no?” GG: “Not that I know of.” ML: “Any update on the UAP hearing?” GG: “No.” ML: “No?” Grothman and Laslo walk through a little crowd as they exit the Capitol, as the congressman’s heading back to his office. Visitor: “Sorry!” GG: “We're gonna do something though.” ML: “‘We’re gonna do something’?” GG: “Is the SCIF thing, is that on that?” ML: “That's UAP Caucus members. Burlison spearheaded it, him and Burchett. It was kind of last minute though.” GG: “Oh.” Ask a Pol relies on your support to operate! ML: “Do you — is this, I mean, with the election drawing nearer and your plate full, is this issue falling off or because it's so bipartisan…?”GG: “No. We plan on doing it. It's not because it's bipartisan. We don’t have the facts yet, so we're gonna do something else about it.”ML: “Eventually? GG: “Yeah.” ML: “You think it’ll be before the election or after?” GG: “Probably before.” ML: “‘Probably before’?”Grothman nods in agreement. ML: “Cool. I’ll be watching. Thank you sir.” Matt Laslo’s a veteran congressional correspondent, new media prof. & founder of Ask a Pol — a new, people-powered press corps.Ask a Pol — asking your lawmakers your questions at your US Capitol. Content posted at AskaPol.com is copyrighted. Use our original content to move the story forward. And, please, link to us. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.askapoluaps.com/subscribe
NOW PLAYING
Rep. Grothman says 2nd public UAP hearing needed because "We don’t have the facts yet"
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.