Responding to Bryan Caplan's Continued Critique of the Austrians

In 1997, Bryan Caplan wrote an essay explaining why he was no longer a self-described Austrian. Recently, a reader asked him to comment on that essay. Bob reacts to Bryan's current views, arguing that the history of economic thought is indeed important, and the Misesian approach to praxeology is crucial. Bryan Caplan's Recent Article: https://Mises.org/HAP476a Bryan Caplan's "Why I Am Not an Austrian Economist": https://Mises.org/HAP476b Hoppe's Economic Science and the Austrian Method: https://Mises.org/HAP476c Bob's Cambridge University Press Article on Böhm-Bawerk's Critiques: https://Mises.org/HAP476d A Modern Guide to Austrian Economics: https://Mises.org/HAP476e Bob and David Freidman, "The Chicago Vs. Austrian School Debate": https://Mises.org/HAP476f The Mises Institute is giving away 100,000 copies of Murray Rothbard’s, What Has Government Done to Our Money? Get your free copy at https://Mises.org/HAPodFree Find free books, daily articles, podcasts, lecture series, and everything about the Austrian School of Economics, at https://Mises.org​​. Twitter ► https://twitter.com/mises/ Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/mises.institute/ Instagram ► https://www.instagram.com/misesinstitute/ SoundCloud ► https://soundcloud.com/misesmedia/ Apple Podcasts ► https://podcasts.apple.com/us/artist/mises-institute/1280664810 Rumble ► https://rumble.com/c/c-2212754 Odysee ► https://odysee.com/@mises/ Podcasts ► https://mises.org/podcasts ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9nPQP6Ng7s