"Rewired" | Stance | What Should We Call 1s, 2s, & 6s?

Every Tuesday at www.aroundthecircle.org we release a "Rewired" episode for all members.This is an example of our most recent discussion on stance. We dive into a big term debate in Enneagram world: what do we actually call the stance of Ones, Twos, and Sixes? Are they compliant, dependent, responsive, or reactive? Katie comes in ready to retire some terms altogether, Jeff brings the history from Horney, Riso–Hudson, Palmer, Chestnut, and Naranjo, and together they pull the whole thing apart—from theory to lived experience.Along the way, they tease out why “compliant” and “dependent” miss something essential, how thinking repression really shows up in 1–2–6 land, and why reactive may be the most honest (even if it stings a bit). They also talk about the danger of naming only behavior instead of underlying motive, why Ones are not nearly as “certain” internally as they look, and how terminology actually shapes people’s ability to see themselves clearly.In this conversation:• A quick history of stances: moving toward, against, and away• Why “compliant” doesn’t describe Ones, Twos, and Sixes as well as we think• The case for “dependent” and why it still falls short• Reacting vs responding: what thinking repression really feels like on the ground• How language choices impact coaching, corporate work, and self-understanding• Where Jeff and Katie land—for now—on what we should call the 1–2–6 stance