Risks and benefits with Professor Fenton episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 1, 2026 · 1H 15M

Risks and benefits with Professor Fenton

from Dr. John Campbell · host Campbellteaching

Relative risk versus absolute risk with Professor Norman Fenton, Mathematician, Professor of Risk Information Management Professor Fenton, YouTube channel http://youtube.com/@normanfenton81 And Sub stack https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/ normanfenton.com Link to video on Norman's channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Va9aE98cFCA Download the slides used in this video https://d7694293-ffb8-4ed0-a014-3581d49070e4.usrfiles.com/ugd/d76942_9aec73e0e123495dba17f070437aadc8.pdf Nor What is risk information management? Thinking about risk, what do we mean by absolute risk and relative risk Sounds a bit like the level of risk can be presented in a way that gives a particular impression of a greater or a lessor risk or benefit? Are there occasions when a vested interest might want to give an impression of an increased benefit, or reduced risk from an intervention? How could choosing RRR versus ARR influence the impression given for adverse reactions is medical journals? Conversely Are there occasions when a vested interest might want to give an impression of a decreased risk from an intervention? So will RRR always be higher than ARR? Why can the RRR vary between populations and vary over time? So using one of the two measures to estimate the risk/benefit ratio would lead to different conclusions? How could risk / benefit reporting be optimised in the medical literature? Do you think the editors of prestigious international journals are aware of the differences between RRR and ARR? In the case of this paper from the Journal of Expert Reviews of Vaccines Efficacy and effectiveness of covid-19 vaccine - absolute vs. relative risk reduction https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9115787/ The original phase three data gave an efficacy for Pfizer vaccine, at preventing infection with SARS-CoV-2 of 95%, but it turns out the ARR was 0.84% Why are these figures so different? So is it fair to say that the ‘real world translation’ of the ARR of the Pfizer vaccine over 5 to 6 months of use increased to 3.7%? What do we mean by number needed to treat? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Relative risk versus absolute risk with Professor Norman Fenton, Mathematician, Professor of Risk Information Management Professor Fenton, YouTube channel http://youtube.com/@normanfenton81 And Sub stack https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/ normanfenton.com Link to video on Norman's channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Va9aE98cFCA Download the slides used in this video https://d7694293-ffb8-4ed0-a014-3581d49070e4.usrfiles.com/ugd/d76942_9aec73e0e123495dba17f070437aadc8.pdf Nor What is risk information management? Thinking about risk, what do we mean by absolute risk and relative risk Sounds a bit like the level of risk can be presented in a way that gives a particular impression of a greater or a lessor risk or benefit? Are there occasions when a vested interest might want to give an impression of an increased benefit, or reduced risk from an intervention? How could choosing RRR versus ARR influence the impression given for adverse reactions is medical journals? Conversely Are there occasions when a vested interest might want to give an impression of a decreased risk from an intervention? So will RRR always be higher than ARR? Why can the RRR vary between populations and vary over time? So using one of the two measures to estimate the risk/benefit ratio would lead to different conclusions? How could risk / benefit reporting be optimised in the medical literature? Do you think the editors of prestigious international journals are aware of the differences between RRR and ARR? In the case of this paper from the Journal of Expert Reviews of Vaccines Efficacy and effectiveness of covid-19 vaccine - absolute vs. relative risk reduction https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9115787/ The original phase three data gave an efficacy for Pfizer vaccine, at preventing infection with SARS-CoV-2 of 95%, but it turns out the ARR was 0.84% Why are these figures so different? So is it fair to say that the ‘real world translation’ of the ARR of the Pfizer vaccine over 5 to 6 months of use increased to 3.7%? What do we mean by number needed to treat? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

NOW PLAYING

Risks and benefits with Professor Fenton

0:00 1:15:11

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Eat to Live Jenna Fuhrman, Dr. Fuhrman Our health is our most precious gift and smart nutrition can change your life. Each month, join Dr. Fuhrman and his daughter, Jenna Fuhrman as they discuss important topics in the world of nutrition. Eat to Live will change the way you eat and think about food. XXX Tech by SOVRYN Dr. Brian Sovryn The crossroads between technology, sensuality, and metaphysics - and the longest running anarchist podcast in the world! Brought to you by Dr. Brian Sovryn. Al-Quran In English Dr. Soha The complete Quran translation in English, Narrated by Dr. Soha. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. NEWMORROW SESSIONS - A PodCast Series on the Future of Hospitality Mario C. Bauer, Florian Schneider, Axel Weber & Dr. Tillman Bardt The Newmorrow PodCast is more than a podcast — it's a platform for open dialog on the future of our business, a platform for those building what doesn’t exist yet. Here, we share and embrace our passion for the hospitality industry, but we won’t romanticize the journey. We ask the tough questions, confront uncomfortable truths, and prepare for a future that resists easy answers. We believe that the tougher and wilder times become, the more openly, honestly and humanely people need to talk to each other and act together. We believe, openness, togetherness, and truthfulness should also be cornerstones of a professional community to develop our utopian idea of „open source“. This is a space where visionaries don’t just imagine the future — they wrestle with the paradoxes that shape it: success vs. happiness, data vs. instinct, stability vs. reinvention. Join leaders, entrepreneurs, and thinkers as they share not what made them — but what’s actively shaping them, now and next. So tune in

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Dr. John Campbell?

This episode is 1 hour and 15 minutes long.

When was this Dr. John Campbell episode published?

This episode was published on July 1, 2026.

What is this episode about?

Relative risk versus absolute risk with Professor Norman Fenton, Mathematician, Professor of Risk Information Management Professor Fenton, YouTube channel http://youtube.com/@normanfenton81 And Sub...

Can I download this Dr. John Campbell episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!