Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association - Post-Decision SCOTUScast episode artwork

EPISODE · Dec 21, 2020 · 9 MIN

Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association - Post-Decision SCOTUScast

from SCOTUScast · host The Federalist Society

On December 10, 2020 the Supreme Court decided Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association. The question presented was whether the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) pre-empts the State of Arkansas’ Act 900, which regulates the price at which pharmacy benefit managers reimburse pharmacies for the cost of drugs covered by prescription-drug plans. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that ERISA preemption applied. By a vote of 8-0, the Supreme Court reversed that judgment and remanded the case. Writing for the Court, Justice Sotomayor indicated that Act 900 “has neither an impermissible connection with nor reference to ERISA and is therefore not pre-empted.”Justice Sotomayor’s opinion was joined by all other members of the Court except Justice Barrett, who took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion.Max Schulman, an Associate at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, joins us today to discuss this ruling.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Dec 21, 2020

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association - Post-Decision SCOTUScast

0:00 9:39

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of SCOTUScast?

This episode is 9 minutes long.

When was this SCOTUScast episode published?

This episode was published on December 21, 2020.

Can I download this SCOTUScast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!