S1 E30 - You Can't Do That: Allegations and Amendment to Pleading episode artwork

EPISODE · Sep 2, 2025 · 13 MIN

S1 E30 - You Can't Do That: Allegations and Amendment to Pleading

from iFraud Deep Dive · host iFraud Foundation

Send us Fan MailThis Deep Dive takes a look at an Affirmation in Opposition and its supporting exhibits, from a New York Supreme Court case, Chantel McLaurin v. Andrew Walcott, et al. The affirmation, filed by Plaintiff's counsel, Frank Melendez, Esq., challenges Defendant Walcott's motion to disqualify Plaintiff's counsel, citing an alleged conflict of interest stemming from unsubstantiated RICO allegations against the firm and Plaintiff. Additionally, the affirmation opposes Defendant's request for a change of venue based on counsel's marriage to a judge. What did the court decide? Let's dive in.Support the show

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Sep 2, 2025

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

S1 E30 - You Can't Do That: Allegations and Amendment to Pleading

0:00 13:54

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of iFraud Deep Dive?

This episode is 13 minutes long.

When was this iFraud Deep Dive episode published?

This episode was published on September 2, 2025.

Can I download this iFraud Deep Dive episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!