EPISODE · Jul 16, 2026 · 8 MIN
SC callers debate politicians, medical treatments, and sanctuary cities.
from The Charlie James Show Podcast
Host Charlie James continues his discussions with South Carolina voters, beginning with a returning caller, John, who emphasizes the dissatisfaction surrounding establishment "RINO" politicians in both Columbia and Washington, D.C. Following this, a listener named Jeff from Lancaster raises logistics questions regarding the upcoming August 11th special election date overlapping with the first day of the school year. Next, a caller named Barbara details her experience using homemade alternative medical remedies including a concoction of organic lemon and grapefruit peels to treat illness, referencing historical treatments. Finally, Christina from Travelers Rest calls in to compliment James' interview style and notes another candidate's response alignment with policy approaches used by Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker regarding sanctuary state policies, leading James to recount South Carolina's own past encounters with local sanctuary jurisdictions like North Charleston under former Sheriff Kristin Graziano.
Embed this episode
What this episode covers
Charlie James: All right. Let's go to the phone. John has called back. John, welcome to the program. John: Hey, Charlie. I don't know what happened. I got disconnected. Charlie James: All right. What's up, man? John: Uh, everybody's all worried about a RINO, and I don't mean to uh upset too many people, but you mean like what we had? Charlie James: Yeah. I mean, it's not like we don't I mean, we've got practically a Zoo. We got a zoo full of RINOs in Columbia and and in Washington. John: I was I was talking about Lindsey, and I mean, I don't like to downgrade a man that's dead. I didn't wish him dead. Charlie James: Right. John: But everybody's all worried about a RINO in Washington. You mean like what we had that was I'm I'm sorry. He had to be so what he was. Charlie James: He did. I mean, that's that's the way he voted a lot of times, and I know people get a lot very upset, you know, when you actually get out there and and, you know, speak the truth. I appreciate it, John. Thank you. Let's go to Jeff in Lancaster. How you doing, Jeff? Jeff: Hey, Charlie. How you doing? Charlie James: I'm doing good, man. What's up? Jeff: Uh, thank you for having that interview with the lady, and uh uh number one, I think she's dangerous. Uh, she's very she spun every question that you had uh into the political, psychological framework, and um I was a little disappointed. We love you, so please don't take this as being critical. But you, we thought you should have picked her apart a little bit because her answers were just can. Charlie James: No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. That was No. No, I told you how I was going to handle that conversation. I told you I was going to be I was going to be nice, I was going to be polite, I was going to be respectful. There was no need for me to pick her apart. Jeff: Well, doesn't doesn't it provide her a a free platform? A free platform on that? Charlie James: I don't care. I don't care. Wait a minute. No, because it exposed exactly what I wanted to expose. The difference between the Democrats and the Republicans. Jeff: Right. Charlie James: That's what it did. This audience does not need me to get up there and and and tear a Democrat apart. They know how they feel. They know what they think. Jeff: Well, well, and I I I'm not about tearing people apart. I'm just saying rebutting uh things like that. But anyway, so I I got that. I got that. Charlie James: There's no need. There's no need. When I when I ask you what is your definition of a a woman and you can't give me an answer, that's all the information that I need. Right? I don't don't need to go into any deeper. Jeff: Well, thank you for explaining that. And and and I accept that. Just one more question. When she comes back on, would you consider a little more in-depth, you know, questioning her when she gives an answer? Charlie James: Yes. Jeff: Okay, great. Okay. Charlie James: I will do that. When we have her back on, when we've got a a primary candidate um ready to go, if she comes back on, I'm going to try to schedule a full half-hour with her or yeah, full half-hour with her. I only had 15 minutes uh this time. Jeff: Okay. And this might sound brash, but you know, uh, for example, her answer on uh uh Roe versus Wade. I mean, it is, you know, is killing babies women's healthcare? I mean, that's just a basic question that she's got to answer. Charlie James: Well, that's what she thinks. That's what she thinks. So there you go. All right. I appreciate it, Jeff. Thank you. Let's go to Christina. No, we're going to go to Barbara in Greenville. How you doing, Barbara? Barbara: Well, I'm fine. Um, I called before about the horse ivermectin. Charlie James: Yes. Barbara: And I I forgot the second part of that. I totally forgot. Um, my neighbor had given me homemade hydroxychloroquine. Charlie James: Wow. Barbara: And I also Yeah. She also um I also used that. Basically, it's just you take the peel of a couple organi ...
Ready to play
SC callers debate politicians, medical treatments, and sanctuary cities.
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.