Skip to content
SCOTUS Likely to Keep Obamacare Intact episode artwork

Nov 13, 2020 28 min

SCOTUS Likely to Keep Obamacare Intact

from Cases and Controversies Hosted by Bloomberg Law

The justices wrapped up their remote November sitting with one of the most anticipated cases before the justices this term—the challenge to the Affordable Care Act. Akin Gump’s Pratik A. Shah joined “Cases and Controversies” podcast hosts Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin to game out the likely outcomes that include the justices leaving most of the law intact. The case, California v. Texas, derives from a 2017 amendment to the landmark law known as Obamacare that zeroed out the penalty for failing to purchase health insurance, known as the individual mandate. GOP-led states and the federal government say the mandate was so integral to Obamacare that the rest of the law can’t stand without it. Shah, who filed an amicus brief in the case, explains why that’s unlikely to happen and why eyes should be on Chief Justice John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh.

Episode details come from the podcast's RSS feed.

Embed this episode

Ready to play

SCOTUS Likely to Keep Obamacare Intact

0:00 28:22

No transcript yet.

Requests help us decide what to transcribe next.

Frequently asked questions

How long is this episode of Cases and Controversies?

This episode is 28 minutes long.

When was this Cases and Controversies episode published?

This episode was published on November 13, 2020.

Can I download this Cases and Controversies episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.