Season 3 Podcast 201 The Inflation Reduction Act for Dummies Pt IV The Dirac Equation Paradox

“The Dirac Equation Paradox.” Okay, assuming you have listened to Podcast 197 Pt I “How Taxpayers view inflation reduction”; and Podcast 199 The Land of Laputa; and Podcast 200 Xeno’s Paradox, in this the final podcast on The Inflation Reduction Act, I shall address how Congress uses the Dirac Equation Paradox to reduce inflation.The Dirac equation in one way is similar to Zeno’s Paradox but just the opposite in another, However, that is the way of paradox.  Using Zeno’s Paradox allows Congress to increase inflation indefinitely thus dividing our spending power into half indefinitely yet still keep the illusion that we will never run out of money.  It is clearly explained in the previous podcast to everyone’s satisfaction.  Using the Dirac Equation Paradox allows Congress to continue the illusion that they can get something from nothing. They are similar in that they are both paradoxes, both were discovered by geniuses, and best of all both allow Congress unlimited spending power without running out of money and without burden to the taxpayers. It is the liberal jackpot. Like Biden promised, “You don’t have to pay a dime.”But first let me explain what the Dirac Equation is in layman’s terms so that you can follow the analogy. I hope you will be as excited as Congress when you understand how brilliantly it works. As we have learned through global warming and the Covid crisis the liberals become very animated when they have solid science on their side regardless of the facts. In fact, Barack Obama and Al Gore received Nobel Prizes just for preaching the liberal agenda while holding high office. Facts, truth, and common sense were not even relevant because science was behind them.  After all they have something in common with the genius Paul Dirac. They all three won Nobel Prizes. It stands to reason that they must be equal in intelligence. Of course, Paul Dirac had to shake the world with his discovery.  All Obama and Gore had to do was to shake their fist at conservatives, but why quibble over trifles. The Nobel committee couldn’t possibly be biased and surely, they would not stoop as low as the Oscars that favor liberal propaganda so there must have been some deeper reason to award the world’s highest honor on those who by all appearances had nothing to offer but party propaganda.  Paul Dirac, an English theoretical physicist who won the Nobel prize for physics at age 31, predicted the existence of the positron or first anti particle, also called anti matter, which is identical to the electron, only with a positive charge. It was like predicting the existence of ghosts and then proving it.The positron made up half the matter of the universe. In other words, an invisible world mirrors the visible world. In the visible world protons, neutrons, and electrons combine to form atoms, called matter. Dirac predicted that those had a mirror image, but with a different electric charge that combined to form antimatter. Dirac combined quantum mechanics with special relativity. The electron has a negative charge. The positron is a particle with a positive charge that acts like an electron.  When they meet, they annihilate each other, their energy released as light.  The implications of that are astonishing scientifically because, unless something intervenes, we can never have a solid universe which means that planets, moons, suns, stars, galaxies, etc. could never form.  In other words when matter and antimatter meet, besides energy expressed in flashes of light, there should be nothing rather than something. Can you see where this is leading? It means that something can come from nothing because we do have moons, planets, suns, stars, and galaxies. Science has frantically been trying to unify the four forces of nature to explain the phenomenon of the existence of celestial bodies. Where they have failed Congress has succeeded.