Season 3 Podcast 246 “What is Real, Pt 14, Implications of the Assumptions of Science” 5

Season 3 Podcast 246 “What is Real, Pt 14, Implications of the Assumptions of Science” 5In the previous podcasts on Implications of the Assumptions of science, we discussed the following false assumptions of theoretical science:·      Assumption One: There is no intelligent design and no intelligent designer.·      Assumption Two: Life was created by accident.·      Assumption Three: Man is nothing but an accidental collocation of atoms.·      Assumption Four: We live in an accidental universe.·      Assumption Five: Man is an animal, and man is a machine; thus has no freewill. ·      Assumption Six: Man is ruled by determinism and thus has no freewill.In this podcast we shall address the following logical fallacy of science:·      Assumption Seven: There is no life prior to earth.The fundamental flaw in the views of theoretical science concerning the nature of man is the false idea that life has a beginning.  They think that life began by accident on earth with the procaryotic cell and evolved into a complex human being and will continue to evolve into an even more complex human being. To theoretical science life is biological. That is why Stephen Hawking refers to man as a biological machine. The physical body does not have life in itself as proven by the fact that the body is subject to death.  Life isn’t. The body would be nothing without the spirit. Again, I repeat a part of the creation story found in Genesis:7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.All living things from the least cell to the most complex have a spirit or they would not have life. The cell dies.  The spirit doesn’t. That alone debunks the idea that man is a biological machine. The physical body is a sophisticated biological machine but the soul, which is made of the spirit and the body, isn’t. The analogy of man and machine only works when limited to the physical or biological component. That which goes back to dust cannot have life in itself.Perhaps we should ask the question, “What is life?”First, we must begin with the idea that life cannot be created or destroyed.  Life self-exists and has existed throughout the eternities.  There is no other suitable explanation.  God created our spirit in his image, and he created our physical body after his likeness, but if you claim that God created life, you have the inevitable question, “Who created God?”One of the most fundamental laws of the universe must be this: “Something can never come from nothing.” We accept the fact that matter and energy cannot be created or destroyed. They self-exist. Why would it be difficult to assume that the life force cannot be created or destroyed? God had to come from somewhere. God cannot create himself because of the law stated above. When dealing with creation, the first thing we must dismiss is the unsustainable ideas that ·      Something can come from nothing·      That life came about by accident·      That the universe came about by accident·      Life has a beginning·      Matter and energy have a beginning·      ·      There is no intelligent design and no God. Such arguments fall apart very quickly, and suddenly science must start making excuses for every contradictory piece of evidence such as the existence of life, the existence of the goldilocks zone, the existence of man.