Section 230 Reform: Big Tech Accountability or Free Speech Killer? episode artwork

EPISODE · May 15, 2026 · 8 MIN

Section 230 Reform: Big Tech Accountability or Free Speech Killer?

from ClashCast · host ClashCast

Should Section 230 be reformed — or would that destroy free speech on the internet?In this episode of ClashCast, Dr. Richard Hale and Prof. Ji-na Kim debate one of the biggest battles in American tech policy: whether Big Tech platforms should keep broad legal immunity for user-generated content, or finally face responsibility for harmful content they amplify.Dr. Hale argues that weakening Section 230 would force Meta, Google, YouTube, X, and other platforms to over-censor users out of fear of lawsuits.Prof. Ji-na Kim argues that Big Tech has abused its immunity while profiting from disinformation, harassment, deepfakes, election interference, and algorithm-driven harm.This debate covers Section 230 reform, Big Tech immunity, free speech, social media censorship, platform liability, disinformation, content moderation, Meta, Google, X, and the future of the open internet.Is Section 230 protecting online freedom — or protecting Big Tech from accountability?#Section230 #BigTech #FreeSpeech #SocialMedia #Censorship #PlatformLiability #TechPolicy #Meta #Google #ClashCast

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 15, 2026

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Section 230 Reform: Big Tech Accountability or Free Speech Killer?

0:00 8:46

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of ClashCast?

This episode is 8 minutes long.

When was this ClashCast episode published?

This episode was published on May 15, 2026.

Can I download this ClashCast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!