Section Three Punditry: The Good, The Bad, and The Silly episode artwork

EPISODE · Jan 3, 2024 · 1H 49M

Section Three Punditry: The Good, The Bad, and The Silly

from Amarica's Constitution · host Akhil Reed Amar

The nation awaits the Supreme Court’s seemingly inevitable review of the Section Three case from Colorado, and perhaps Maine as well.  Media around the world is weighing in with editorials and op-Ed’s; a smorgasbord of legal, political, and predictive arguments from professors, editors, elected officials, and others with their own range of expertise.  We continue our attempt to help you make sense of these by choosing pieces that make the range of arguments out there.  We do our best to present their argument and respond to it, bringing Professor Amar’s considerable armamentarium to bear for your benefit.  And this week, Akhil has at least two - maybe three - major new ideas he brings to the national discussion.  They can be found here first.  CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jan 3, 2024

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Section Three Punditry: The Good, The Bad, and The Silly

0:00 1:49:03

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Amarica's Constitution?

This episode is 1 hour and 49 minutes long.

When was this Amarica's Constitution episode published?

This episode was published on January 3, 2024.

Can I download this Amarica's Constitution episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!