EPISODE · May 27, 2026
Sermon Discussion | Ladies and Gentlemen: Part 3
from UBC Beavercreek - Sermons · host Jason Wing
Big Idea: Biblical manhood and womanhood had principles today that come from the patterns of the old testament Pattern #1 Men as the Formal Leaders of God’s people Pattern #2 Men as the recognized heads of their families Pattern #3 Women as glad (and grieving) childbearers in their families Pattern #4 Women as heroic helpers of God’s people Practicing Biblical womanhood and manhood means: Acknowledging the male and female patterns in Scripture, including the OT Accepting the principles of men as heads and women as helpers in their families and in God’s family Admitting our need for Jesus to faithfully (not flawlessly) implement these principles Q. We’ve explicitly stated that biblical manhood can be fulfilled outside of marriage but I don’t recall the opposite being said. For completeness sake, can biblical womanhood be fulfilled outside of marriage? Q. In pursuit of aligning my actions and thoughts with principles of Biblical womanhood in everyday life (not in the context of church leadership), how do I discern when a desire to exercise leadership or authority is coming from my created personality, my spiritual gifts, or from a sinful desire to have dominance? Q. How can I use principles in scripture to approach the concept of household voting and similar patriarchal ideology gaining traction in the far right political movement without contradicting the truth I know about God’s plan for male leadership in the household? (I’m thinking about Doug Wilson and the Reformed Evangelical Church or trad wives, etc.) Q. If Adam had not eaten the forbidden fruit presented by Eve, would we have been cursed? Q. Jason did a great job defining extreme worldviews on masculinity and feminism. However, it would be helpful to expound on the dangers of less extreme worldviews. Most of us do not live in the extreme. Q. What about the tradwife vs girlboss debacles that oftentimes lead to division?...There is the male “feminist” vs “macho-man” battle. For the feminist inclined men: They defer to women so much that it breeds isolation. And unfairly burdens them with family responsibility. How does this mar the plan God ordained? For the macho inclined men: They balk at doing the dishes or laundry and demean other men that would take up less ‘manly’ pursuits. How does this negate God's plan? These are two less extreme worldviews that most people hold and yet they breed hurt. Q. Does manhood and womanhood have more to do with our intrinsic souls and the way we uniquely bear His image than the daily lived out responsibilities we bear? Thank you for listening and sending in your questions. As a reminder you can send your questions to [email protected] and we will see you next week.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Sermon Discussion | Ladies and Gentlemen: Part 3
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.