EPISODE · Feb 3, 2020 · 9 MIN
Seventh Circuit finds excess policy ambiguous, yet uses extrinsic evidence to rule in insurer's favor (Ep. 32)
from Michael's Insurance Podcast · host Michael Young
Michael discusses the Seventh Circuit's recent decision in Lexington Insurance Company v. RLI Insurance Company, in which the court find RLI's policy ambiguous yet used extrinsic evidence to rule in RLI's favor in this complex excess policy dispute. You can read the court's full opinion here (http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2020/D01-27/C:19-1426:J:Hamilton:aut:T:fnOp:N:2464901:S:0).
What this episode covers
Michael discusses the Seventh Circuit's recent decision in Lexington Insurance Company v. RLI Insurance Company, in which the court find RLI's policy ambiguous yet used extrinsic evidence to rule in RLI's favor in this complex excess policy dispute. You can read the court's full opinion here (http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2020/D01-27/C:19-1426:J:Hamilton:aut:T:fnOp:N:2464901:S:0).
NOW PLAYING
Seventh Circuit finds excess policy ambiguous, yet uses extrinsic evidence to rule in insurer's favor (Ep. 32)
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.