Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California, Docket No. 22–1074

from 9robes · host 9robes.ai

The Court held that the Takings Clause does not distinguish between legislative and administrative land-use permit conditions. The Court vacated the judgment of the California Court of Appeal and remanded the case for further proceedings. More SCOTUS cases at https://9robes.ai

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Apr 12, 2024

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

NOW PLAYING

Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California, Docket No. 22–1074

0:00 5:26

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of 9robes?

This episode is 5 minutes long.

When was this 9robes episode published?

This episode was published on April 12, 2024.

Can I download this 9robes episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!