Short Circuit 409 | Obviously Unconstitutional episode artwork

EPISODE · Jan 2, 2026 · 1H 5M

Short Circuit 409 | Obviously Unconstitutional

from Short Circuit

IJ’s Anya Bidwell interviews two civil rights lawyers for a wide-ranging conversation about what it’s like to litigate on behalf of people behind bars. She welcomes on Sam Weiss of Rights Behind Bars and Elizabeth Cruikshank of the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection (ICAP) to hear stories of qualified immunity, prison conditions, prisoners making their way in the court system without lawyers, and many other topics. To begin with we hear the story of what it was like for Sam, with Elizabeth’s assistance, to start a new nonprofit and then the story of an early success for them, the Supreme Court’s decision in Taylor v. Riojas, which jump-started the “obviousness” exception to grants of qualified immunity. Then each report on a recent success from the federal courts of appeals, Elizabeth’s from the Fourth Circuit and Sam’s from the Third. Click here for transcript. Apply to be a summer fellow at IJ here! Taylor v. Riojas Frazier v. Prince George’s County Montanez v. Price

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jan 2, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Short Circuit 409 | Obviously Unconstitutional

0:00 1:05:49

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Short Circuit?

This episode is 1 hour and 5 minutes long.

When was this Short Circuit episode published?

This episode was published on January 2, 2026.

Can I download this Short Circuit episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!