Shortened Days, Long Consequences
from SpEd-Splaining Hosted by Stefan Troutman
In J.N. v. Oregon Department of Education, families allege that students with disabilities across Oregon were routinely placed on shortened school days, losing critical instructional time. Even after Oregon passed new laws limiting the practice, the Ninth Circuit revived the case, signaling the issue isn’t settled. This episode asks: when a child’s day keeps getting shorter, is that support—or exclusion? To submit feedback or questions, fill out the form at this link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeCcjgEdpruEaYMbgCRCv6jCbARf7HGSPwdCpR8ein-37A6lQ/viewform?usp=dialog You can find more information our connect with us on our webpage here: https://www.ncesd.org/services/sped-splain-podcast/ Want to tell us something? Text us!
Embed this episode
What this episode covers
In J.N. v. Oregon Department of Education, families allege that students with disabilities across Oregon were routinely placed on shortened school days, losing critical instructional time. Even after Oregon passed new laws limiting the practice, the Ninth Circuit revived the case, signaling the issue isn’t settled. This episode asks: when a child’s day keeps getting shorter, is that support—or exclusion? To submit feedback or questions, fill out the form at this link: https://docs.google.co...
No transcript yet.