Should Have Gone To SPAD-Savers episode artwork

EPISODE · May 29, 2020 · 42 MIN

Should Have Gone To SPAD-Savers

from Inside Briefing with the Institute for Government · host Institute for Government

Could the Government ever have controlled the fallout from Dominic Cummings’ breach of COVID travel rules, and is it too late now? Why is Boris Johnson so bound to his key advisor? And with SPADs more centrally vetted than ever, do a majority of No.10 staff owe more personal loyalty to Dominic Cummings than to the Prime Minister? Special guest Tim Montgomerie joins us to discuss a defining week for the Johnson government. Plus: might the UK change its mind on an extension with the EU after all? “Dominic Cummings is a genius – but nobody’s perfect.” – Tim Montgomerie “One surefire way to shut down debate inside government was to say ‘Dom doesn’t like that’. I’ve always feared that the Reign of Terror would lead to a Reign of Error.” – Tim Montgomerie Presented by Bronwen Maddox with Hanna White, Jill Rutter and Georgina Wright. Audio production by Alex Rees.  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 29, 2020

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Should Have Gone To SPAD-Savers

0:00 42:54

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Inside Briefing with the Institute for Government?

This episode is 42 minutes long.

When was this Inside Briefing with the Institute for Government episode published?

This episode was published on May 29, 2020.

Can I download this Inside Briefing with the Institute for Government episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!