Should malaria be eradicated? episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 7, 2017 · 15 MIN

Should malaria be eradicated?

from Medicine and Science from The BMJ · host The BMJ

The World Health Organization, the Roll Back Malaria Partnership, and the United Nations, all have a vision of a malaria-free world. The world has already committed to malaria eradication, albeit without a target date. Bruno Moonen, deputy director for malaria at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, thinks that for malaria, eradication is the only equitable and sustainable solution. Where as Clive Shiff, associate professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, thinks this is a top-down strategy, dependent on massive concentrated funding until finished - funding which could be more effectively spent elsewhere. In this podcast they debate whether malaria should be eliminated, or eradicated, and how that might work. Read the full debate: http://www.bmj.com/content/356/bmj.j916

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 7, 2017

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Should malaria be eradicated?

0:00 15:28

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Medicine and Science from The BMJ?

This episode is 15 minutes long.

When was this Medicine and Science from The BMJ episode published?

This episode was published on March 7, 2017.

Can I download this Medicine and Science from The BMJ episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!