Should NATO be pay-to-protect? episode artwork

EPISODE · May 13, 2026 · 9 MIN

Should NATO be pay-to-protect?

from The Indicator from Planet Money

NATO was formed after World War 2 as a collective security alliance that would prevent future world wars. But President Trump sees NATO more like a transaction between countries where allies have to pay up or be left undefended. On today’s episode: How NATO is actually funded, why this longstanding alliance is under strain, and how the U.S. could pay the cost for these frayed relationships.Fact checking by Sierra Juarez.Your Next Listen— Europe's NATO members take an economic hitConnect with The Indicator — Sign up for the Indicator’s brand new newsletter — Find our socials, newsletter, YouTube and more!— For sponsor-free episodes, subscribe to PlanetMoney+ See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 13, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Should NATO be pay-to-protect?

0:00 9:15

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The Indicator from Planet Money?

This episode is 9 minutes long.

When was this The Indicator from Planet Money episode published?

This episode was published on May 13, 2026.

Can I download this The Indicator from Planet Money episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!