Should Patient Authors Be Paid? Navigating Ethics, Equity, and Recognition episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 22, 2025 · 28 MIN

Should Patient Authors Be Paid? Navigating Ethics, Equity, and Recognition

from In Plain Cite

Today, we dive into one of the most pressing and polarizing questions in medical publishing today: Should patients who contribute as co-authors be compensated?Joining us are Veronica Porkess of UCB Pharma and Simon Stones of Amica Scientific, two voices at the forefront of patient engagement. Together, we'll explore the shifting landscape of patient authorship, unpacking the ethical dilemmas and practical challenges that shape how and when patient authors are compensated. From issues of equity and selection bias to questions of transparency and tokenism, this conversation challenges traditional thinking and asks: In a future that truly includes patients, what does fair recognition really look like?To join ISMPP, visit our website at https://www.ismpp.org/ This episode is generously sponsored by Avalere Health.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 22, 2025

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Should Patient Authors Be Paid? Navigating Ethics, Equity, and Recognition

0:00 28:19

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of In Plain Cite?

This episode is 28 minutes long.

When was this In Plain Cite episode published?

This episode was published on July 22, 2025.

Can I download this In Plain Cite episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!