Should Paying Hacker Ransoms Be Illegal? episode artwork

EPISODE · Oct 14, 2022 · 53 MIN

Should Paying Hacker Ransoms Be Illegal?

from Open to Debate · host Open to Debate

With cyber threats and ransomware on the rise globally, the Biden administration has enlisted America’s tech titans to help blunt their effects. Amazon, Microsoft, and Google, are all in discussions with Washington over how to strengthen the nation’s critical infrastructure defenses against a growing array of both private and state-sponsored attacks. Skeptics question just how much can be achieved, given how connected U.S. society has become. But solutions are emerging, from lifting the veil of cryptocurrencies, a favored transaction among hackers, to making the paying of ransoms illegal. In this special edition of Intelligence Squared’s Agree-to-Disagree series, John Donvan sits down with David Sanger of The New York Times for a closer examination of these attacks before launching into a much more specific debate with two cyber security experts. The debate: Should paying hacker ransoms be illegal? Cyber Threat Alliance president and chief executive Michael Daniel and Rapid7 vice-president Jen Ellis square off in light of recent high-profile hackings.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Oct 14, 2022

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Should Paying Hacker Ransoms Be Illegal?

0:00 53:15

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Open to Debate?

This episode is 53 minutes long.

When was this Open to Debate episode published?

This episode was published on October 14, 2022.

Can I download this Open to Debate episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!