Should SCOTUS Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution? episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 9, 2023 · 53 MIN

Should SCOTUS Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?

from Open to Debate · host Open to Debate

Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.  In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?  Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett   Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby  Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 9, 2023

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Should SCOTUS Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?

0:00 53:15

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Open to Debate?

This episode is 53 minutes long.

When was this Open to Debate episode published?

This episode was published on June 9, 2023.

Can I download this Open to Debate episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!