Social Media on Trial: Unpacking the Landmark 2026 Decisions episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 8, 2026 · 1H 1M

Social Media on Trial: Unpacking the Landmark 2026 Decisions

from CLEs You Actually Want to Hear

In the span of 24 hours in March 2026, juries returned historic verdicts against Meta in both New Mexico and Los Angeles, reshaping what platform liability looks like in practice. Eric Goldman (Santa Clara University School of Law), Jess Miers (University of Akron School of Law), and Jeremy Rosenthal (Texas Defense Firm) break down what these decisions mean for practitioners, covering the product defect theories that circumvented Section 230, what plaintiffs must prove, the pending cases to watch, the science behind the addiction framing, and the criminal defense implications for attorneys advising clients today. Participants will leave with a comprehensive understanding of the evolving legal landscape around social media liability and practical tools for advising clients in this rapidly developing area.Audio versions of Beverly Hills Bar Association programs are eligible for Self-Study CLE credit in California. Visit www.bhba.org/podcasts for more information.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 8, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Social Media on Trial: Unpacking the Landmark 2026 Decisions

0:00 1:01:18

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of CLEs You Actually Want to Hear?

This episode is 1 hour and 1 minute long.

When was this CLEs You Actually Want to Hear episode published?

This episode was published on June 8, 2026.

Can I download this CLEs You Actually Want to Hear episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!