SoS 2026: Geofencing, Monsanto, and Haircuts episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 17, 2026 · 1H 10M

SoS 2026: Geofencing, Monsanto, and Haircuts

from Civil Discourse · host Nia Rodgers and Dr. John Aughenbaugh

Aughie and Nia finish this year's big Supreme Court rulings with three cases: Chatrie v United States, Monsanto Company v Durnell, and Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety. Chatrie centered on the use of geofencing warrants under the 4th Amendment. Monsanto argued that only the EPA could label its products cancer-causing, which the EPA has declined to do. Landor centered on immunity of guards to be individually sued for violating a prisoner's religious rights.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 17, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

SoS 2026: Geofencing, Monsanto, and Haircuts

0:00 1:10:04

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Civil Discourse?

This episode is 1 hour and 10 minutes long.

When was this Civil Discourse episode published?

This episode was published on July 17, 2026.

Can I download this Civil Discourse episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!