Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 5, 2026 · 27 MIN

Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission

from So Ordered · host So Ordered

The Court holds that the Securities and Exchange Commission need not prove that investors suffered a pecuniary loss before it may obtain a disgorgement award against a securities-law violator. Under traditional equitable principles, a court may strip a wrongdoer of the gains attributable to his unlawful conduct even when his victims cannot show any measurable financial harm, so a finding of pecuniary loss is not a precondition to disgorgement. CASE: Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission AUTHOR: Gorsuch, J. DECIDED: 2026-06-04 OPINION: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-466_5i26.pdf AI DISCLOSURE: The voices in this podcast are AI-generated. The narration is produced by a machine-learning voice synthesis model. Tone, inflection, pacing, and emphasis are artifacts of the model and should not be attributed to any individual. The text being read is the majority opinion as published by the Supreme Court of the United States with light adaptations to improve readability.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 5, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission

0:00 27:34

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of So Ordered?

This episode is 27 minutes long.

When was this So Ordered episode published?

This episode was published on June 5, 2026.

Can I download this So Ordered episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!