Standing Requirements for Appealing PTAB Decisions: Recent Developments episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 16, 2020

Standing Requirements for Appealing PTAB Decisions: Recent Developments

from Finnegan Intellectual Property Law Podcasts · host Michael J. Flibbert, Michelle G. Rice

Although a party need not have Article III standing to appear before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), it must establish standing when appealing an adverse PTAB decision to the Federal Circuit. Building on the reasoning in a line of cases following GE, JTEKT, and AVX, the Federal Circuit has further elaborated on the particular standing requirements a party must meet to maintain an appeal. For instance, recently in Pfizer, Argentum, and Grit Energy, the Court closely examined the evidence required to show injury based on economic harm or infringement risk, and stressed that the appellant must prove that standing exists at the outset of the appeal and at all later stages. In this article, Finnegan attorneys Mike Flibbert and Michelle Rice review the Federal Circuit’s analysis in recent standing cases, and provide practical considerations for parties seeking to establish, or refute, standing to appeal PTAB decisions.  Read the full article here.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 16, 2020

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Standing Requirements for Appealing PTAB Decisions: Recent Developments

0:00 0:00

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

When was this Finnegan Intellectual Property Law Podcasts episode published?

This episode was published on July 16, 2020.

Can I download this Finnegan Intellectual Property Law Podcasts episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!