Stop Talking About the Other Guy: How Negative Campaigning Could Hand Roy Cooper the Senate - July 14, 2026

Give Us Your FeedbackNegative campaigning might fire up the base, but in North Carolina’s Senate race it could be handing Roy Cooper the advantage. We walk through fresh data on unaffiliated voters — the state’s largest voting bloc — who are tired of being talked down to and want honest, issue‑based leadership instead of partisan warfare. Using Michael Whatley’s campaign as a case study, we show how focusing on Cooper and Trump while offering zero clear proposals leaves independents and persuadable Republicans cold. Until candidates stop telling us why we should hate the other guy and start telling us exactly what they’ll do, “Senator Roy Cooper” becomes a much more likely outcome.What you’ll learn / Key moments00:01 – Why voters are tired of campaigns that just bash “the other guy” instead of solving problems.00:08 – Pew and Independent Center data on how unaffiliated voters see partisan warfare and what they actually want.00:27 – How North Carolina’s unaffiliated voters will decide the midterms — and why they reject party conformity.01:27 – The core problem with Michael Whatley’s issue page: lots of Cooper and Trump, zero concrete proposals.02:27 – Why this messaging could turn Roy Cooper into a terrible senator for North Carolina — and what needs to change.What you can doIf we want better representation, we have to stop rewarding campaigns that only trade insults. Share this episode with friends who care about North Carolina’s future, and start pressing every candidate — at events, on social media, and in local coverage — for specific, practical plans to tackle immigration, crime, and the cost of living. When we demand clear solutions instead of tribal talking points, we push both parties toward the kind of serious, honest debate that unaffiliated and conservative voters are looking for.Support the show