Submissions from experts and advocacy groups were ignored - what was the point? episode artwork

EPISODE · Nov 30, 2024 · 16 MIN

Submissions from experts and advocacy groups were ignored - what was the point?

from Critical Line Item with Tom Ravlic

Many thousands of submissions were made to a parliamentary committee that considered the legislation related to the social media ban for people under the age of 16 with only 107 being uploaded, and quite of few of those opposed the law as proposed. Tom Ravlic looks at some of the ones you might not have heard about and asks whether this is like the Voice Referendum where parts of the community were not successfully carried on a journey. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Nov 30, 2024

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Submissions from experts and advocacy groups were ignored - what was the point?

0:00 16:03

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Critical Line Item with Tom Ravlic?

This episode is 16 minutes long.

When was this Critical Line Item with Tom Ravlic episode published?

This episode was published on November 30, 2024.

Can I download this Critical Line Item with Tom Ravlic episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!