Summer of SCOTUS: Taxes episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 31, 2020 · 1H

Summer of SCOTUS: Taxes

from Civil Discourse · host Nia Rodgers and Dr. John Aughenbaugh

Aughie and Nia discuss the SCOTUS rulings concerning access to President Donald Trump's tax records, and whether U.S. Presidents can claim absolute immunity from the state criminal process. In the instance of Vance, the SCOTUS ruled that the President does not have immunity from a state criminal subpoena. In the instance of Mazars, the SCOTUS ruled that the Congress must present a compelling case to a judge (and outlined questions that should be asked) to justify their subpoenas.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 31, 2020

Embed this episode

Aughie and Nia discuss the SCOTUS rulings concerning access to President Donald Trump's tax records, and whether U.S. Presidents can claim absolute immunity from the state criminal process

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

Summer of SCOTUS: Taxes

0:00 1:00:04

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Civil Discourse?

This episode is 1 hour and 0 minutes long.

When was this Civil Discourse episode published?

This episode was published on July 31, 2020.

Can I download this Civil Discourse episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!