Supreme Court Abortion Pill Argument Light on Merits episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 29, 2024 · 15 MIN

Supreme Court Abortion Pill Argument Light on Merits

from Cases and Controversies · host Bloomberg Law

Arguments in the challenge to the abortion drug mifepristone suggest the Supreme Court will nix the dispute on technical standing grounds. Justices from across the ideological spectrum suggested the anti-abortion doctors at the center of the case were asking too much. Cases and Controversies hosts run through the lopsided arguments that focused little on the merits and almost exclusively on whether the doctors could prevent access to the drug nationwide. They also discuss how the Supreme Court’s action—or inaction—means South Carolina can use an unconstitutional voting map in the upcoming election. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 29, 2024

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Supreme Court Abortion Pill Argument Light on Merits

0:00 15:48

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Cases and Controversies?

This episode is 15 minutes long.

When was this Cases and Controversies episode published?

This episode was published on March 29, 2024.

Can I download this Cases and Controversies episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!