Supreme Court Rules in Double Jeopardy Case

from Advisory Opinions Hosted by The Dispatch

David and Sarah give a rundown of two Supreme Court opinions this week: Shinn v. Ramirez and Denezpi v. United States. They discuss an interesting phenomenon called stochastic terrorism as they cover the attempted murder of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. The gun safety legislative package reached bipartisan compromises in the Senate, but will the House be a bigger hurdle? Our hosts think so. Show Notes: -Shinn v. Ramirez -Denezpi v. United States -Strickland v. Washington -AEDPA Act of 1966 -French Press: "There Is No Right Person to Hate"

Episode details come from the podcast's RSS feed.

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

Ready to play

Supreme Court Rules in Double Jeopardy Case

0:00 1:08:05

No transcript yet.

Requests help us decide what to transcribe next.

Share this episode

Similar podcasts

Beyond the Neutral Zone beyondtheneutralzone We are 4 idiots that like to talk about sports but will follow the conversation wherever it leads.Year-round general sports conversation and opinions with a main focus on the NFL. Daily Cuts The best interviews from CNA 938 on current affairs, health, entertainment and money, curated dailyThe views and opinions shared during this podcast series are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of Mediacorp Pte. Ltd. or its group of companies.

Frequently asked questions

How long is this episode of Advisory Opinions?

This episode is 1 hour and 8 minutes long.

When was this Advisory Opinions episode published?

This episode was published on June 14, 2022.

Can I download this Advisory Opinions episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.