Supreme Court Rules in Malicious Prosecution Case

from Advisory Opinions Hosted by The Dispatch

David and Sarah talk about a fascinating Supreme Court case that no one is discussing, unleash again on Yale Law School, and then spend the last few minutes on Sarah’s game show idea—a revolutionary combination of social science and dating advice. Plus, book recommendations! Show Notes: -Louisiana v. American Rivers -Thompson v. Clark -“Rethinking Sex: A Provocation” by Christine Emba -David in The Atlantic: “Consent Was Never Enough” -Christine Emba: “Consent is not enough. We need a new sexual ethic.” -“Powers and Thrones: A New History of the Middle Ages” by Dan Jones

Episode details come from the podcast's RSS feed.

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

Ready to play

Supreme Court Rules in Malicious Prosecution Case

0:00 1:11:13

No transcript yet.

Requests help us decide what to transcribe next.

Share this episode

Similar podcasts

Beyond the Neutral Zone beyondtheneutralzone We are 4 idiots that like to talk about sports but will follow the conversation wherever it leads.Year-round general sports conversation and opinions with a main focus on the NFL. Daily Cuts The best interviews from CNA 938 on current affairs, health, entertainment and money, curated dailyThe views and opinions shared during this podcast series are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of Mediacorp Pte. Ltd. or its group of companies.

Frequently asked questions

How long is this episode of Advisory Opinions?

This episode is 1 hour and 11 minutes long.

When was this Advisory Opinions episode published?

This episode was published on April 8, 2022.

Can I download this Advisory Opinions episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.