Supremely Funny: 2019's Funniest High Court Moments

from Cases and Controversies · host Bloomberg Law

It's time to count down everything from the best songs to the best memes to the best mince pies for the holidays. We want to do our part at Bloomberg Law. So we present this special "Supremely Funny" episode on the funniest high court moments of 2019. From Ruth Bader Ginsburg's damning admission that she doesn't read her cumbersome financial documents to Samuel Alito's late-night observations on the D.C. Metro, there's something for all court watchers.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Dec 20, 2019

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

NOW PLAYING

Supremely Funny: 2019's Funniest High Court Moments

0:00 10:59

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Cases and Controversies?

This episode is 10 minutes long.

When was this Cases and Controversies episode published?

This episode was published on December 20, 2019.

Can I download this Cases and Controversies episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!