PRABOGANDA! The world is getting crazier, people are acting more and more insane. The end of the world is tomorrow, tomorrow, tomorrow. See, there's only one thing to do when the world is really hard.
Listen to Basil and contest, it is thus this week's news and events through the lens of bible prophecy. You are listening to the known crime news tomorrow. You're listening to the name of the crime news talk today is May 11th, 2022. This is episode number 483 and today, the terrible takeover.
And Razzle Dazzle, I'm your best buddy Basil. My name is Gondz, your favorite agent for vodka tour for Christ, aka the Cabana Boy here to serve you a podcast. That brings you the best news which is the Gospel message of Jesus Christ while reporting the egregious with a well-rounded, physically grounded take on the world events. And we're back.
We are here. That's right. The world events just keep on eventing. And just to give you a little rundown here, in case you were wondering what we're going to be covering in this show, of course, we've got some UFO news and how the government is going to be handling the disclosure.
Of course, we've got an update on Putin getting back into a corner of China making moves over on their side of the world, flippy, replacing humans in a very, I don't know, it's disturbing. Yes, we've got the second Civil War, the second American Civil War we're going to be talking about. Gondz has a breakdown of some savage crypto news that happened over the past 48 hours. Of course, some big COVID, wack chain news doesn't always happen folks, but some big things have been moving.
And of course, news on Bill Gates that you're just not going to want to miss. And rounding out the show, some Antarctica, Tom Foolery that I think everybody can tell you. Tom Foolery, how dare you. This is important information about the ice wall.
How dare we say that about our friend, Tom? All right, Gondz, well, start us out. What's our one of our lead stories here? We don't know what you're looking at.
What's driving that thing? A lot of states are... Just a review real quick. Last couple episodes, two episodes ago, and I was solo, I'm going to catch you up as well real quick.
We covered that political article with the headline, the UFO Briefings on Capitol Hill have begun, lawmakers aren't impressed. And we highlighted the fact that basically they're saying, yeah, we don't want more reports. We get it. We got a lot of reports.
We need more about their existence, like where are they from? Like, so that was a big thing. And then of course, the NDAA and the creation of the Anomaly Surveillance and Resolution Office, which is more bureaucracy. And then we, in the last episode, covered how some scientists, most notably here, Lynn Rothchild, NASA's Ames Research Center astrobiologist, basically suggesting alongside Eric Kirschenbaum, or zoologist from University of Cambridge, saying the NASA needs to redefine the definition of the technology.
And they're appealing to Jack Volei's interdimensional hypothesis that aliens aren't flesh and bone like we are, they're interdimensional. We're thinking too small. Yes, yes. How dare you define life the way we are.
So that leads us to this story from the New York Post. Congress set to hold first US hearing on UFOs in half century. It's happening. Where were all these other hearings happening?
How subcommittee is set to hear out of this world testimony next week as federal lawmakers hold the first open congressional hearing on Earth? Open congressional hearing on UFOs since 1970. The top defense intelligence officials were slated to answer questions from the House Intelligence Committee on counter terrorism, counter intelligence, and counter proliferation on Tuesdays hearing, according to the New York Times. I love this right here.
Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle were hopeful that the new hearing would lead to improved national security and possibly a greater understanding of the universe. Oh, good. Just what our government tends to focus on. I know.
I love that. These lawmakers are sort of, you know, everything's being presented in the context of government and law and all of a sudden, it's like, oh, it helps us. Greater understanding of the universe. It's a, the rep bill moment for the lawmakers.
The purpose of this event was to shed light on quote, one of the great mysteries of our time and to break the cycle of excessive secrecy and speculation with truth and transparency and quote, rep Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who chairs the House Intelligence Committee reportedly said Adam Schiff. Adam Schiff. Think about the context of, you know, his involvement in the last few years and the Trump drama and all that kind of stuff. Oh, my.
Wasn't Adam Schiff, wait, I might be thinking of somebody else. Is Adam Schiff the one who's a big cannabis activist as well? I don't know if that's the case. I'm going to look that up.
Yeah, I'm going to look that up. You can see me. This may be the very, this is a quote. This may be the very thing that brings Democrats and Republicans together at least for an hour or two said, some committee chair Rep Andrey Carson, Indiana Democrat according to the article.
The hearing comes on the heels of an intelligence report on unexplained aerial phenomena that was delivered to Congress last summer and covered some of that information already. The report found that the vast majority of the 144 incidents reviewed by intelligence officials over the last two decades could not be explained 144. Little signaling there, maybe? Oh, yeah.
The explanation means that the military eyewitnesses who encountered UFOs on an almost daily basis off the coast of California 2017 and the footage that was verified by defense officials were not seeing programs that US meant to keep secret. Some of the unidentified objects see my military personnel travel that is speed of 43,200 miles for 3200. It's a number nine, you know, nine, the perpetual motion number. Okay.
Vindicated, whistleblowing ex-intelligence officer for the US Department of Defense told the post as directly from the DOD. The congressional report did not include if the UFOs were extraterrestrial or the work of countries like Russia or China, but said most of the report phenomena do represent physical objects of unknown origin. So, you know, they're really repeating the stuff. And here's where you were asking about the history of this basil.
It will be the first time Congress has taken up the issue in more than a half century in the late 60s house minority leader Gerald Ford spearheaded a pair of hearings on UFO sightings, which the Air Force dismissed as swamp gas. That's where that comes from. You know, the whole UFO based on gas. Okay.
Military leaders. So I think what I was getting confused with was I thought they'd been holding hearings in Congress, but these were just the reports I was thinking in the past couple years. They've been, you know, addressing these reports in Congress. Yes.
That's what they're tired of. They want to hear me. They want to hear me. Military leaders concluded that UFOs had never threatened national security, said there was no evidence they were from outer space.
Okay. And declined to investigate further according to the paper, never threatened national security, which means, you know, it presumes their existence, their presupposes their existence. They're friendly. They're friendly.
Yeah. They're friendly. Or they're ours. Said there was no evidence they're from outer space, which is like, they are from outer space.
We're, we're, we're, we're, okay. All right. So they exist and they're not from outer space, which again, aligns with this narrative building, which I admit would be a challenge. Interdimensional.
Yeah. Or they're ours. Or we created them in a lab. Yeah.
Right. So there you go. I mean, this is going to be a continued sort of soft disclosure, slow disclosure, I would say. It's not necessarily soft.
And, you know, just seeing all the politicians get involved, like Adam Schiff talking about, all of this is quite remarkable. And given the direction that I feel like they're trying to take it, it's just fascinating to track. And people were upset. I guess on social media, like, who cares about the, and we're really talking about UFOs right now.
When Ukraine and the virus, you know, people are like, why are we even talking about this? But I think it's because, again, a lot of shifting going on, a lot of reset taking place. Adam Schiff. Adam Schiff.
There you go. Boom. It's all. Can I lay out a possibility?
Yeah, of course. Ukraine, you know, we're going to hear just in a moment about the nuclear, nuclear possibilities in that conflict. What a wonderful moment to disclose the UFO reality in that, you know, perhaps there's a nuclear threat. And so Ukraine can save us.
They can stop it. In their classic fashion to stop a nuclear disaster. And boom, you can wrap up Ukraine, Russia, Nukes, and UFOs all in one go. The aliens helped us stop World War III and nuclear destruction.
And boom, we move into the Golden Age of Aquarius or whatever. Which will be the, yeah, but to see the thing is once they start murdering people who declared Jesus Christ as Lord, then we'll know, you know, hey, this is written about in the Bible. Those aliens will come down and they'll say, yeah, no, we're here to save you. We've seeded your planet.
We've been watching over you. Yeah. And Christians are the bad guys. So go get him.
Go get him. Go, go, slide him. Which by the way, that one of the things that Jesus talked about would happen is wars and rumors of wars. Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia.
It's all there. It's all happening. It's all happening. We're wrapping it all up in 01.
I'm going to start out with this article from CNN.com. I'm going to read a little bit and then summarize the rest because it will sort of set the stage for some more things we'll talk about. I don't know if it's at the top there too. Sorry.
What's that? There's a breaking news, a key vote on Bill aimed at preserving access to abortion nationwide fails in the Senate. Oh, interesting. We'll get to that in a moment, by the way.
Yeah, yeah. Breaking news in regards to China, which we'll bring in in a second. Okay, so we're starting out with CNN. The headline is Putin's current dilemma was JFK's worst fear.
Oh, don't do this. Yeah. Part of the reason why I thought this was important, this sort of structure for an article was important is because as we know the media sort of creates reality, you know, they claim to record reality, but we know that creating reality, creating history, being the historical scribes. However, they say it is happening.
It's just a picture. It's true. It's not just the picture. It's just the scribes in general.
Exactly. Yeah, they are the literal ones. And the victors, of course, being the billionaires that own the media. So Putin's current dilemma was JFK's worst fear.
And the reason I thought it was apropos is because when you reference as they love doing, everybody in these elite circles love referencing history as a trigger, a trigger to get the responses out of people that they want. And the article goes like this, reflecting on the Cuban Missile Crisis. President John Kennedy once warned that the nuclear powers, quote, must avert those confrontations, which bring an adversary to a choice of a choice of a choice of a choice. A humiliating retreat or a nuclear war.
The showdown with Russian President Vladimir, the showdown comes with Russian President Vladimir Putin over Ukraine does not yet mirror the one minute to midnight brinkmanship that brought the Soviet Union and the west to the cusp of Armageddon. October 1962, but Kennedy's superpower logic is resounding poignantly as Putin gets backed into a corner by the strategic disaster of his war. Ukraine's heroic resistance and an extraordinary, multi-billion dollar allied conveyor of arms and munitions. That's a US.
It's our $33 billion. Beautifully written there. Our military surplus liquidation projects that we've been doing. President Joe Biden, who has always stated his twin aims are to help Ukraine defend itself and to avoid a direct escalation with Putin that could risk a nuclear war.
Seems to have been mulling JFK's warning. Again, two Catholic presidents are two only Catholic presidents. They're trying to, you know, trying to, again, use the word, stated his twin aims and then place JFK and Biden next to each other kind of as twins. By the way, you highlighted the showdown earlier with Putin and the kayfabe aspect of it, you know, the WrestleMania using that exact same...
Sunday, Sunday, showdown between Putin and Putin. Sorry. Go ahead. Out of fundraiser in Potomac, Maryland on Monday night, Biden confided that he was concerned Putin had yet to devise an exit from the war despite the former KGB officers calculating nature.
This is interesting because JFK's issue. There was a wonderful podcast series that I listened to recently that did a wonderful deep dive into the Cuban Missile Crisis and the historical... Well, the historical recording of JFK's thinking and they quoted it at the top, which is, you know, it's not that you want your enemy to find a way out. It's that you create the way out for your enemy.
And I actually mentioned it here, but I don't know if I'll read it. So the fact that Biden is like, no, I don't think he's smart. He's calculating enough to get out of this is basically saying like, he's getting out. I'm not going to help him.
I'm going to let him launch a nuke, which is a really cool thing for our president to say. Senior national security officials, meanwhile, admit they do not yet know what kind of incremental Russian success in the Eastern and Southern Ukraine would allow Putin to declare victory of sorts and escalate the war. Yes, go in. You're sorry.
Yeah. Deescalate. This is all a worry, but it's one that seems somewhat discordant with US policy. After all, Washington's explicitly stated aim in supporting Ukraine is that Putin loses the war.
Biden has asked Congress for $33 billion to send military and other kinds of aid to Ukraine. And the House on Tuesday voted to pass a roughly $40 billion bill. Washington is flooding the battlefield with an anti-tank anti-aircraft missiles radars drones artillery rounds and howitzers. This aggressive Western approach, the slow progress of Putin's war of attrition and the lack of any diplomatic effort to end the war, means that it is almost certain the Russian leader will get further back into a dangerous corner.
Putin's only exit option right now appears to be capitulation and a tacit admission that the Western effort combined with the fierce Ukrainian courage got the better of him, a position that would be politically impossible to adopt. And they talk a bit more about this. They reference the press conference from Director of National Intelligence, Avril Haines, how he told a congressional committee that the US view is there is not quote, an imminent potential for Putin to use nuclear weapons. So that's okay news.
We were just told how scary the nuclear, the whole JFK comparison. Right. Well, yeah. Russia's skipping down a bit.
Russia's willingness to threaten the use of nuclear weapons in a way that the Soviet Union rarely did during Cold War to terrorize Western publics is, meanwhile, underscoring the kind of advantage the world's most fearsome arsenal can bring to rogue states that want to forestall the possibility of Western intervention. Now, this next headline here, Putin shows no sign of eyeing the exits. More or less just talks about how he's just kind of plowing forward, making moves. They talk about his victory day speech.
He's willing to prolong the whole thing, which, look, of course, we are willing to prolong the whole thing as well. We're sending money over there. We're putting Ukraine into debt. We just bought the whole show.
Of course, it's got to go on for a while. We're going to have lots of ups and downs and it'll be a, it's an adventure. And if we shut down, if we shut down this war, we're just going to have to start another one. Yeah.
You know, keep it going. So it's kind of this back and forth about whatever, you know, trying to create this theater for the public. There is this quote, which was interesting quote, the current trend increases the likelihood that President Putin will turn to more drastic means, including imposing martial law, reorienting industrial production or potentially escalatory military actions to free up the resources needed to achieve his objectives as the conflict drags on or if he perceives Russia is losing. And Ukraine Haynes said that's the national security, national intelligence director.
The idea that Putin could be coaxed out of a strategic cul-de-sac in which he finds himself also falls down for two other reasons. First, the Russian leader refused all diplomatic off ramps. Not true. Wasn't he the one that he started the conversation first?
I'm not holding on to Putin. This is just how it happened. We're hearing that, you know, reporting what I heard. Yeah.
But we're rewriting history. Sorry. Sorry. You know, I'm going to skip kind of, they kind of go into like, oh, he doesn't want to lose his reputation.
He does want to lose his prestige. You know, he's a crazy man who's more, you know, just basically painting him as Trump. He's Trump. So you never know what he's going to do.
Yeah. Skipping down a bit more just to make the point, they talk about how French President Emmanuel Macron tried to talk sense into him and couldn't do it. And I mean, if he can't do it, nobody can't. Yeah.
Macron then spoke to Chinese President Xi Jinping on an all-an-tuesday after which the Elissee Palace said they'd agreed on the urgency of a ceasefire. Like that. He's like, hey, gee, your buddy Putin's not listening, man. You got to talk to your friend.
Yeah. Love it. Skip it down again. His comments reflected a gr- they're talking about comments from what's his name.
Oh, this was Biden. It's just Biden talking, you know, he's just talking about how all the massacres and the butchery and, you know, at least they want to think about the possibility of bringing a ceasefire and starting again some credible negotiations. That's the situation right now. I think that we have to think deeply on how to address this.
Yeah. No kidding, Biden. It's productive segment. Yeah, really productive things.
His comments reflected a growing nervousness that without some kind of outside intervention. UFOs. Aliens. Aliens, perhaps?
Interventions. A growing nervousness that without some outside intervention Putin could well get pushed into the kind of corner that Kennedy was talking about in a speech at American University in June 1963. Months earlier as the world had held its breath in fear of nuclear war, Kennedy had engineered a way for Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev to stand down without losing face in their standoff over QUT. Six decades later, some kind of similar accommodation, however, painful that might be could be required for Putin.
So they make the point that Kennedy created a way out for Khrushchev. And that was sort of the genius of Kennedy at the moment. And Biden is doing the exact opposite. He sort of has this idea that's not my responsibility.
He is to find his own way out of this, which is literally the exact opposite strategy that ended the Cuban Missile Crisis. And I think the reason is because Ukraine, we still have a mission in Ukraine. And that is to capture it, to get them into debt, to take control of it. We're not finished with Ukraine yet.
So we don't want to give Putin away out too early. And so they're trying to compare JFK and Biden as these sort of two sides of the same Catholic coin. And yet we see Biden doing the exact opposite of what got us out of the first nuclear crisis or the most memorable nuclear crisis. And that's the way CNN is setting it up for us.
And I think we do need some outside influence, perhaps it's interdimensional beings. But at the same time, we also have the China problem. And you want to tell us about the China problem, guys? Yeah, so before we jump into the China problem real quick, the same quote that we just covered about Marshall Law in Russia.
There was a business insider headline, Putin will likely resort to imposing Marshall Law in Russia to support his invasion of Ukraine. US intel chief says that article has been taken down by business insiders. I don't know why stuff is being taken down, but there you go. They didn't like it.
Yeah, so moving on to China, there's a scene and back of scene and here. US intelligence officials warn China is working hard to be able to take over Taiwan militarily. Working harder? Hardly working.
Yeah, the US intelligence community believes that China is actively attempting to build a military capable of taking over Taiwan. By the way, from what I've heard and been reported, it's already ready. Like once if they do a physical military takeover of Taiwan, it would take like a day. It would just be like boom.
Well, and what people are forgetting and what the media is not reporting anymore is that China was militarily threatening Taiwan. Months before the Ukraine thing happened. They've basically been pulling stunts all through the pandemic, flying planes over, invading their space in the ocean, parking ships. They've been militarily threatening Taiwan for quite some time.
And now suddenly they're like, ooh, China might be thinking about it. So here's again, this is CNN. So keep that in mind. The US intelligence community believes that China is actively attempting to build a military capable of taking over Taiwan, even in the face of US support for the island.
Top US intelligence officials told Congress today. The threat to Taiwan between now and 2030 is acute. Director of National Intelligence, Avril Haines said during a hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee, in our view that China is working hard to effectively put themselves into a position in which their military is capable of taking Taiwan over our intervention. Haines said declining to publicly provide further details on the intelligence community's timeline because independent people have been reporting more accurate information that these people cannot for national security.
But she and the Defense Intelligence Agency head Lieutenant General Scott barrier cautioned the US doesn't yet know what lessons Chinese President Xi Ping will take from Russia's war in Ukraine and the Western assistance that has flowed to Kiev. How Xi and the Chinese Communist Party interpreted the events of that crisis could impact its timeline and approach to Taiwan, the two officials said. Haines and barrier also noted that the US believes that China would prefer to avoid a military conflict over Taiwan, if possible. Quote, I believe the People's Republic of China would rather not do it by force.
I think they would rather do this peacefully over time. Taiwan is also of course, I mean sure. Well, right. You know, there's, I don't know if we want them to do it peacefully over time because if they go on and do a full military thing, you know, we're not going to send US troops over there, but we would love to give Taiwan $33 billion worth of American debt.
We need some, yeah, it'll be. Get another little proxy post out there outside Chinese. You've been mentioning the economic hitman, but that's exactly what this would be again, this economic war, funding weapons and stuff. Taiwan is also learning some important lessons.
Okay, quote, there are some things that we can do with Taiwan, he said. I think they're learning some very interesting lessons from the Ukrainian conflict like how important leadership is. How important your puppet master is or the your puppet. Now how important small unit tactics are, how important a non commissioned officer core is and really effective training with the right weapon systems and with those systems with the right people would be able to do to thwart that.
Interesting. Okay. So yeah, of course it sounds like these guys want military conflict on Saturday, CIA director Bill Burns also said that Russia's conflict in Ukraine has affected China's calculations. When it comes to how and when it goes about attempting to take over or take control of Taiwan clearly, this is a quote clearly the Chinese leadership is trying to look carefully about the lessons.
Okay, we get it. They're looking at it. They're looking at it. They're looking at Ukraine and learning lessons.
And again, in my mind, this is already almost like a done deal. I think China's going to flip the switch and make this happen at some point in the next few years, you know, and again, once that happens, the, if the US, depending on how things look when the relationship, if the US decides to do similar things that we've been doing to Russia, then that's a huge, a much bigger disrupter because of our, you know, goods and services or more so goods tied to China. They want it so badly. I know.
I know. I know. Especially with the band-aid, we just, you know, rebuild. Let's come on.
Let's make it happen. Just do the, you know, do the pain and just let it happen. Right. So real quick, I just want to, so why though?
Why is the thing? I don't tell you why. So we talked about from the very beginning, the fact that Ukraine is the bread basket of Europe, 25%, and something crazy, like 25% of Europe's and possibly the world's wheat all comes from Ukraine. It is sort of a resource hub for much of the world.
And that's, you know, that the wheat disruption in Ukraine has become a big problem around the world. Skyrocketing food prices, not just in the US but everywhere. And so the US basically purchasing Ukraine or giving Ukraine $33 billion worth of debt that they'll never be able to pay back, secures our access to their wheat production. We've done this.
We've pulled this move all over the place. We've pulled it in South America for oil. We've pulled it in places in North Africa and the Middle East. It's a common thing.
Again, go read or listen to the confessions of economic hitman. But we're doing it in Ukraine specifically for the wheat production. Taiwan, the reason why we would want to do the same thing in Taiwan and why China moving militarily on Taiwan, allowing us again to both refresh our military industrial complex and put Taiwan into American debt, is the semiconductor industry. Semi-conductors are, you know, Taiwan is the biggest semiconductor manufacturing center in the world.
That's partially why it's, you know, you can't buy cars with computers in them right now. Anything that's used as semiconductors, which is one of the vital ingredients and pretty much any piece of electronics. That's why electronics and cars and everything is so expensive, is because semiconductor industry has been disrupted. That's also why China wants the semiconductors.
But if we have a justification to go in and defend Taiwan and make them, you know, sort of be holding to us and we get them in a bunch of American debt, boom. Now, through both of these conflicts, we secure 25% of the world's wheat production. And my gosh, I don't know what exactly the number is, but it's a huge percentage. It's 50%.
I believe of the world market of semiconductors in Taiwan. So boom, we control electronics and we control food, both through these sort of manufactured conflicts that again, we have no interest in stopping. It is only to the US's benefit as the sort of, I don't know, empire of the world for these conflicts to go. I don't like, you know, because obviously China, excuse me, China trying to secure Taiwan and then maybe Russia can sort of piggyback off of that.
So they own part of that economy or whatever. I don't like the fact that China is challenging us because the US is like, we can just keep pretty money. We can just keep. We want it, man.
That's what we're going to do. We're going to keep printing money. We're going to cash to fund the war. Oh, it's great.
It's great. So I'm just predicting right now. And that's why they're going to be dragging on Ukraine for so many reasons, but we got to secure Ukraine and we got to secure Taiwan. That is the long play here for the continued dominance of the US in the world itself.
The times and the places may change, but nothing else does. It may look different. It's the same play. It's not exactly the same.
It's not exactly the same, but whatever happens in the next years, we will gain control of Taiwan either through debt or through occupation. In the name of defense, by the way. I've got a quick, oh, just a quick note. At the same time, this is a Reuters.com headline, Biden says, fed targeting inflation, China tariffs under review.
So he came out, he did a big speech about inflation where he's finally saying, yeah, inflation is real, but it's all the Republicans' fault, which is pretty funny. And at the same time, he took the opportunity to talk about lifting tariffs on China, meaning opening up trade with China even more, which is just a deliciously ironic situation for us to be in. You want that quote? I have it highlighted here.
Yeah, yeah. So as part of this article, it says here, quote, we're in power. Biden said when asked whether he deserved the blame for high prices, quote, we control all three branches of government. Well, we don't really.
He added lamenting fellow Democrats' inability to get other spending bills passed because of their narrow control of Congress. Yeah, also that's not why. That is also not why that's an erroneous claim because the Democrats do not control all three branches of government. I'm not sure at this point.
Biden knows what all three branches of government are. It's the executive branch, the parlamentary branch. What is it called? What is it called?
Parlamentary branch? No, judicial executive. I know. What's the one of Congress?
I've read the word for it. No, I'm a brain fart. Oh my gosh. That's embarrassing.
Yeah, look it up real quick. Fix it. It's something like the somebody in chat help us. Geez.
judicial. judicial. judicial. And then executive judicial.
Stop it. Stop it. legislative. Thank you.
Okay. So you got the executive, the legislative and the judicial and it's hilarious because we've been, we are right in the thick of mainstream narrative of, you know, it's the conservatives that control the judicial branch, the Democrats do not control the judicial branch. That is a silly thing. And the idea that a political party could control the judicial branch goes against the very concept of the judicial branch.
This is Joe speaking too much to his background conversations with Obama. Obama's in there. We control it. We did it.
And Joe's like, you know, backtracking. You know, we got to write articles about it. I didn't mean it and all that kind of stuff. Yeah, I know we love it.
Okay. Here's just a quick little piece of breaking news that came out this morning, Gons. Okay. Now this is, I can only find this in the kind of weird sketchy India news.
Sure. articles, which are, we know, you know, half of Indian news. It's propaganda. Our propaganda and the CIA has a hand in that, you know, international business times being a classic.
A representation of how the Smith month Act works, which is, yeah, we can't lie to the American people, but we can get other countries to lie to the American people and then report on them lying. Or report their lies as truth. And that's what the international business times is. It's a sort of intelligence outlet.
But so this has come from the I B times.com. Chinese president, this was this morning, Chinese president Xi Jinping suffering from cerebral aneurysm. Yeah, Chinese president Xi Jinping is suffering from a cerebral aneurysm, which resulted in him being hospitalized at the end of last year. reports in Indian media.
I thought this was, maybe this is an ongoing thing. It's ongoing. We're bringing it back. I thought it was like more breaking, breaking, breaking.
Well, it's breaking because the news about Taiwan is coming out. So this is the perfect time. He's just like to remind everybody. He's losing his mind or he's losing his reality.
Exactly. It's the same thing they did to Putin. His brain is broken. His brain is broken.
He's a mad man. Whatever he does from now, he's acting out in some existential, you know, tantrum because of his impending death. They did the same thing to Putin and they did the same thing to Trump. So there you go.
Just keep an eye out. This more than anything tells me that something's about to happen. Man. Man, it's just one end.
It's just one end. And this is what it feels like, Gons, when it's Wednesday. Hey, guys. Hey, guys.
It is Wednesday in my dudes. It is Wednesday in my dudes. It is Wednesday in my dudes. It is Wednesday in my dudes.
In case you were confused, folks, about what day it is, now you know in several different tunes. Yeah, it's Wednesday. You know, Wednesday is always I think everybody's favorite show and I'm glad to be here, Gons. Do you have any personal updates that the people need to know about?
Don't think so. Don't think so. Okay. Well, I do.
And it's time for me to come clean about something, Gons. Yes, yes. The people out there. Gather round.
Gather round radio screens. The conspiracy theories have been flying. The, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the radio operators have been spreading the theories around the world and show your face. Show your face.
Show your face. And the time has come and the timing is perfect. Okay. So, I'm not to tell you, it has been in the works for some time now.
And, you know, just having had to wait for the perfect moment. There are reasons for that. Very good reasons. But it's time, it's time to come clean.
And this is referring to the propaganda rooster. It's the propaganda rooster. Yes. You may have long time listeners of the show may have noticed that over the past few weeks, there has been a new, a new character on the show.
Just some sort of adversary that pops up here and there. And I, I, we so lovingly named him the propaganda rooster last episode. And the long story short is over the past, I don't know, however long that it took and through the complete, complete will of God and out of no power of my own. I've done it.
I've done the thing. I've done the thing that we've all wanted to do and that needed to be done. And that is, that is off the grid, baby. Oh, I've gone dark.
I am off the grid. And officially out, out in the, in the no man's land. I'm not connected. You and Bill Gates, man.
You guys are taking over all the farmland in the country. That's a good thing. I've trans-planted my life away from a metropolitan center and I have gone off the reservation. And yes, and that is quite good.
Yeah. Congratulations. Thank you very much. I'm very excited about it.
Not connected to any utilities that are controlled by any sort of municipal government. I got my own water. I got my own solar. What has been short on time here?
But what has been the most inconvenient sort of a trade-off between the, you know, grid life and the off grid life? Everything. Everything is inconvenient. Life, just life is inconvenient.
But it feels good, you know. I will say, just as an example of how inconvenient everything is, I have not played a video game since I moved. Yes. Yeah.
Which is not because I couldn't. I could do it. I just have no time because I'm constantly fixing things, constantly trying to keep the propaganda rooster alive. I've got some other animals that I will be sharing.
I've got some chickens. I've got my own eggs going now. So yes, I've done it. I'm from living the dream, baby.
All right. Well, you can help test out the, you know, Starlink, all that kind of jazz. Yeah. The old city.
Yeah. All sorts of things. And let's see here. So that's what the propaganda rooster is.
He is my rooster and he is a pain in the butt. But again, he loves the show, apparently. When he hears me sort of deconstructing the news, I think he has some sort of agents from the lizard people who have come to keep an eye on you. Keep an eye on you.
He's going to get me through the window during the show and yells at me. Where's the song? Real. Where's the song?
It's true. He's some sort of government drum. So there you go. That explains a lot of the things that have been going on.
And I'll be happy to be able to talk about it more now. So there you go. Look forward to that. And like I said, I'm going to produce it.
Sorry. That's a good producer. Just stepping on you. No, that's good.
They should step on me. But yeah. So anywho, let's talk about the Valley Valley model. That's how we get this show done, folks.
We are not. No advertising, affiliate codes. No nothing. We are completely independent.
You might hear other media properties are independent, but what are they independent from? Because if they're taking corporate money, they certainly aren't independent from the corporate machinery that runs our lives. But here, that's exactly what we do, folks. We are entirely funded by listeners of the show.
There are people who get value from the show and understand that it can only continue with the support of producers. And that's what they are. They are producers, not just generous donors or whatever. They are also those things.
But just like the real world, if you pay to have a piece of media produced, you are a producer. And our executive producers are people who participate to the maximum possible level. And we thank them here at the top of the show and we'll hear more from them later on. We got two executive producers today, Gons.
Are you ready to thank them? Ready to go. First of all, we have executive producer David W. David W.
Thank you very much. Thank you very much, David W. We also have another wonderful executive producer named executive producer Anonymous. Anonymous.
We're doing love. That's right. So thank you very much to our executive producers. We'll read notes and thank you again later on in the show.
And yeah, what was I going to say? That's it. Thank you very much. Let's get on with the show, I suppose.
Moving on today. Do you want to ride without? That's right. It's time for the Flippy update.
Flippy is our colloquial name for the disembodied robot arms that are taking our jobs and slaving our children and flirting with our spouses. We use talking about Flippy as a way to explore all the new, fun and exciting ways that robots are taking over the world. Just how there's nothing we can do about it. Today, Flippy is coming from DailyMail.co.uk.
And the headline is Inside Ocado's Giant Hive Warehouse in Southeast London where an army of 2,000 robots pick up to 2 million food items per day, five times faster than a trained human worker. I love those long headlines from DailyMail. It may look like a nightmare sequence from a science fiction film, but a network of fast working robots is now hard to work in Southeast London. British grocery giant Ocado is using an army of robots at its 563,000 square foot warehouse in an arith next to the Thames to gather up items for customers' orders.
More than 2,000 robots are working there nonstop 20 hours a day, each picking up to each each picking up to 2 million food items in a shift. We're done. It's over here. It's 2,000 robots times 2,000.
2,000 per robot. Right now 4,000. No, no, no. They are saying each robot picks up 2 million food items.
That's 2 billion, I believe. Yeah, 4 billion. 2,000. Yeah, 4 billion.
Sorry, 4 billion. 2 million. It's just 4 billion. 4 billion food items every 20 hour shift.
Oh my gosh. All right. And they add this wonderful little kicker at the end far beyond the capability of a human worker. That's how it's over.
We are being obsolete. The eight wheeled robots scoot around a giant grid like structure called the Hive, so called for its honeycomb like holes that contain inventory. Powered by an algorithm, the robots pick up crates of items to take to a human to put into shopping bags for delivery. Have you seen the video?
Yeah, more to me. Wow, this is crazy. It almost looks fake. Yeah.
Like it looks like a computer generated, you know, something you'd see in the matrix. Right. It's sorting. Yeah, there's like carts that move around on this big.
I don't know. With a thousand robots just scooting around past each other in all different directions. It's perfectly sort of orchestrated. This robot kind of looks like a washing machine or something.
It's got like a square. It's a mix between washing machine and R2D2. Right. Right.
Now here's the kicker. Yeah, here's the kicker to the whole thing. Although humans are still involved in the process, the robot army replaces hundreds of human staff who would otherwise be walking around the vast fulfillment center in search of the items on order. Ever since we started the flippy update guns years and years ago, they've made a striking attempt to convince us that the robots are not here to replace us.
They're here to make our jobs easier. They're here to work with us. They're here to, you know, increase our ability to focus on that the human work to make our work better, not just our lives more convenient, but our human work better and more fulfilling. And they have just completely dropped that.
Of course, that was always a lie. And that was the main reason we even started the flippy update was to highlight the technocratic deception. You know, the technocracy, the technocrats, they use the campaign slogans are, you know, yes, we're going to use technology. We're going to use robots, but it's all to make human life better, to make our work more fulfilling, to make our work easier, certainly not to replace us.
That would be silly. And as we have watched flippy reveal the fact that that is a concerted deception by the rulers, the lizard people in charge of these types of industries, we now can see that the reporting, the mainstream narrative crafting of these robots here to help us make our lives easier has been a lie the whole time. They are here to replace us. Hundreds of human staff who would otherwise be walking around the Vass fulfillment center, a.k.a.
working, having a job to support their family. No, no, no longer are they needed in this capacity. How long it took them to build this thing? This is a massive warehouse and all the goods coming through.
This is a lot of logistics. They've seen that. That's the point. Yeah, that's the point.
They've they had to hide the fact that it would be replacing people the whole time. It probably did take years. It may have took as long as we've been doing flippy updates and they had to keep the lie going until it was too late. And we have hit that point for the people of London, the class of people who rely on these types of jobs to support their family are just out of luck, baby.
And the technocratic deception, one veil of the seven veils of the technocrats has fallen. And the real trick is, once that veil falls and the deception is shown, life is so convenient that we don't even complain. Right. And therefore, trade off.
Exactly. You won't tell us until the trade off is ready. Too late to fight it. And like I have said a couple of times here, this is an example, not just of the robot issue, but of the technocratic utopia in the first place.
The same lie, the same campaign promises of the technocrats are the same ones that once they are fully integrated, there is no going back. It's a terrible takeover. Go to the next slide. And finally, livestream clips, email is text notification, streaming posters, show notes, ways to connect with other panerians and how to become a producer.
That's right. And while you're at it, you'll see a link there at canarycribe.party to subscribe to Ravel on Apple PODGIS. Ravel is a podcast I do with Dr. Christopher Reingates.
We explore scripture, society and scandal. And we have our Mother's Day episode up now. Mother's Day may be past, but your mother's still matter. And so do ours.
I've had a lot of great feedback about the interview I did with my mother. So if you want to hear some funny stories about me from Mama Basil, you can go listen to Ravel and get some background. Get some background on your old best buddy there. You can find that on all your podcast players, except for Stitcher.
And we're also on YouTube and stuff like that. But go subscribe to Ravel. There's two Ravel podcasts, the other one stole our name, but we're the one with the cool logo and name on it. While you're at it, go subscribe to CanaryCry Clips, where we have wonderful producers, where clipping shorter segments of the show, shareable, carable pieces, where you can go review the information, share it with your friends without demanding that they listen to a long podcast.
So you can go to CanaryCry Clips on YouTube and Odyssey. And while you're at it, send a text message, send the word Canary to the phone number 877-740-3226. That's one more time, Canary to 877-740-3226. To get a text message, alerts never miss a show again, because Big Tech, they don't like telling you when we go live or when we have an episode or whatever.
So you can just get text alerts sent straight to your phone. And I write them. So you can say that your best buddy Basil sent you a text and it's very important that you run off to watch a video on YouTube, or not YouTube, Odyssey rather, wherever you want. Okay, there you go.
Okay, let's just check in on some Roe v. Wade stuff. Okay, this is going to be just sort of straightforward. This is an article from the Guardian.com, which is a UK outlet, by the way.
They love writing about the US. This is from Robert Reich, and the article is titled, it's an opinion piece. The Second American Civil War is already happening. Ooh, there's something about the UK outlet writing about the Second American Civil War.
They love it. It just grinds like, yes, look at them trying to eat each other. Why we use our two-watch them fall. Those are rebels.
And it reads like this, the US Supreme Court's upcoming decision to reverse Roe v. Wade, an early draft of which was leaked last week, doesn't ban abortions. It leaves the issue to the states. And I love this about the article because it took a UK article, a UK opinion piece about American Second Civil War to finally state the facts about Roe v.
Wade. Roe v. Wade is not about a constitutional right to abortion. It is about a constitutional right to privacy between a doctor and his patient.
And yet every US outlet just loves saying that they love implying that Roe v. Wade was, so A is a law. They don't mention that it's a legal precedent. They consider it like it's written into the Constitution that abortions are there.
Now look, I get it. I don't need anybody to explain to me the logic behind that. I'm just saying it's deceptive. It's the media.
What are you going to do? But it's like a UK opinion piece. The Guardian to say the US Supreme Court's upcoming decision doesn't ban abortions. It leaves the issue to the states.
Again, the whole concept of how our government is set up is specifically to leave many decisions up to the localities, which in this case are called states, versus some sort of big daddy government. But here we go. As a result, it will put another large brick in the growing wall separating blue and red America. Mm, build the wall.
Build the wall. The Second American Civil War is already occurring, but it is less of a war than a kind of benign separation analogous to unhappily married people who don't want to go through the trauma of a formal divorce. Oh, that's wonderful. It's a colorful thing.
It's a jab at American, you know, the whole system here too. How high is our divorce rate? It's a disunity. Oh, yeah.
No, I hear you. It's a good jab. And it's wonderful because, you know, it's this whole article is about the disunity in America as if it was like that. As if we were a unified.
Yeah. Or as if that's like the highest noble virtue of a society is unity, you know. But calling it also, I mean, I love the juxtaposition of calling it an American Civil War, but also a benign separation of friendly agreements that were unhappy together. And so, but we don't want to do the paperwork of a right.