Texas Flooding was CAUSED by Weather Manipulation and DAM RELEASES. North Carolina & Three Gorges Dam in China, ALSO Dam Releases. 1931 Yangtze River Basin in China killed Millions.

I always like Walking in the Rain so no one can see me Crying. - Charlie Chaplin    Hurricane Helene -North Carolina LAND GRAB – to make room for TESLA mining in the EXACT same area?  They want your land.  FEMA Robbery in action. (psychopathinyourlife.com)   DAMS Create Droughts. WHY all the DAMS in Egypt Ethiopia Sudan Turkey Iraq & Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam? (psychopathinyourlife.com)  DAMS will DESTROY the RAINFOREST * Lula is a Lying TRANNY * Soil & Sediment Robbing of Nutrients and means to Survive = DAMS (psychopathinyourlife.com)  State-of-the-art dams, cascade reservoirs turn floods from beast into resource - Global Times Hydroelectricity - Wikipedia How Hydroelectric Power Works (tva.com) How Is Electricity Generated From Hydroelectric Dams or Ocean Tides? - The Environmental Literacy Council (enviroliteracy.org) Some things children need to do in an emergency and how their phones can help: Call emergency services. Children should be taught to dial 911 or the appropriate emergency number on their phones. On many Android phones, pressing the power or side button five times in quick succession will start a countdown, after which the phone will call emergency services. On an iPhone, after pressing the side button five times, the "Emergency Call" option needs to be swiped to place the call.  Provide accurate information. Children need to be able to describe the situation and say where they are when they call 911.  Stay calm. It's important for children to remain calm and speak clearly when answering the 911 operator's questions.  Know their home address. Children should help memorize their home address, which can be written down on an emergency contact sheet.  Use a panic button. A panic button can be set up on a smart home device, such as a Philips Hue dimmer switch, to call specific numbers in the contact list.  Practice. Role-playing a 911 call with the child can help them practice.  Understand the risks. Children must be able to determine whether it is safe to call 911 from where they are. For example, they should be told to leave the house immediately if there is a fire.  Follow directions. Children should follow directions and help with activities like bringing toys and furniture inside to prevent them from blowing away.  Know basic first aid. Older children can be taught basic first aid techniques, but it's important to emphasize the importance of calling an ambulance first.  Have a safety plan. Children should know what to do in the case of fire, including agreed escape routes and meeting points.  1931 Central China Floods: The Deadliest Natural Disaster in Human History Region Affected Yangtze River Basin (primarily) Also included the Yellow River, Huai River, and other tributaries in central and eastern China Provinces impacted: Hubei, Hunan, Jiangxi, Anhui, Jiangsu, and parts of Henan Cause: Converging Hydrological Extremes Unusual Spring Snowmelt from mountains Monsoon Rainfall: Over 24 inches (600 mm) of rain fell during July 1931 Cyclones: A series of cyclones struck eastern China between July and August, intensifying rainfall Soil Saturation: The land was already saturated from above-average rainfall since late 1930 Scale of Flooding Nearly 70,000 square miles (≈180,000 km²) submerged The Yangtze River expanded to appear more like an inland sea than a river Some towns and cities were underwater for over 3 months Widespread destruction of levees, dikes, and embankments built during the Qing and Republican eras Death Toll Chinese government estimate (1930s): 2 million dead Modern scholarly estimates: 3.7 to 4 million people Includes flood-related drowning, famine, and disease outbreaks (especially cholera and dysentery) Why Was the Impact So Catastrophic? No major flood control infrastructure existed at the time Poor communications and disaster relief coordination during the Republican era Large-scale deforestation and farming weakened watersheds Densely populated floodplains along the Yangtze worsened exposure Disease and starvation followed the physical flood damage   Response & Aftermath Nationalist government lacked resources to respond effectively Foreign aid (from missionary and Red Cross groups) was mobilized, but not at scale Sparked new thinking in China about: Hydraulic engineering Need for dams, levees, and hydropower infrastructure Historical Legacy: Led to Future Mega-Dam Projects The devastation of 1931 helped lay the ideological foundation for: Three Gorges Dam (planned since 1950s, built 1994–2012) A national push for hydraulic modernization under Mao Zedong and later Deng Xiaoping Modern Context: How the Yangtze Flood System Has Changed   Factor 1931 Floods Modern Yangtze System Rainfall 24–30 inches in July alone Still susceptible to extreme monsoon rainfall Flood Protection Weak dikes, no large dams Massive dam system: Three Gorges, Gezhouba Death Toll 2–4 million Significantly reduced due to early warning, dams Risk Factors Deforestation, poor communication Urban overdevelopment, seismic risks Flood Area 70,000 mi² (180,000 km²) Modern dams reduce flooding but shift risks   Lessons and Risks Today While dams have reduced downstream flood severity, they introduce new risks: Structural failure (due to seismicity, aging) Upstream landslides Reservoir-induced earthquakes Social displacement and environmental destruction Climate change and extreme rainfall still threaten the Yangtze basin, especially during monsoon months (June–August) Notable Modern Events Related to the Yangtze River 1998 Yangtze Floods: Over 3,000 dead; 14 million homeless 2020 Yangtze Flood Crisis: Tested the limits of the Three Gorges Dam Ongoing sedimentation and pollution concerns in the Three Gorges Reservoir     Three Gorges Dam – Major Concerns  Structural Cracks Shortly after its 2003 filling, inspectors detected around 80 hairline cracks in the dam. Officials stated they were repaired and within design tolerances, but critics doubt long-term durability. Seismic Risks The dam sits atop the Jiuwanxi and Zigui–Badong faults. Water pressure changes have triggered hundreds of small tremors, and experts warn reservoir-induced seismicity could exacerbate fault instability Landslides and Bank Erosion Rapid reservoir-level fluctuations have destabilized slopes. Over 4,600 landslide events were recorded in 11 months after initial filling; more than 7,400 hazard points have been identified since Sedimentation and Water Pollution Slowed river flow traps silt, gravel, pollution, and industrial runoff. This has caused harbor blockages and water quality degradation. Managing sediment and pollution has required massive investments . Ecosystem Decline The dam has disrupted fish migration, reduced downstream yields by up to 70%, and contributed to extinction of species like the baiji dolphin. Social and Cultural Costs Between 1.1 and 1.4 million people were displaced, and nearly 1,300 archaeological sites were submerged. Resettlements often shifted residents to unstable, landslide-prone terrain. How It Works with Other Yangtze River Dams  China operates a coordinated cascade of dams on the Yangtze and its tributaries for flood control, power, and navigation. The system includes major dams such as:  Three Gorges Dam Gezhouba Dam (downstream, run-of-river, 2,715 MW) Wudongde, Xiluodu, Xiangjiaba, Baihetan (on the Jinsha River upstream)   Joint Operation Strategy:  Flood control: Upstream dams retain peak flows during heavy rains, reducing downstream flood risks. Hydropower synergy: Coordinated release of water produces electricity while maintaining reservoir safety. Navigation stability: Controlled flows ensure consistent shipping levels below Gezhouba and Three Gorges. Environmental flow management: Gradual releases support downstream ecosystems, though balancing this with power generation remains complex .  Recent Performance:  In summer floods (e.g., 2020), the system—including 47 dams—reduced peak flows by about 30%, securing flood protection equivalent to a 1-in-100-year event globaltimes.cn.  Summary  The Three Gorges Dam faces significant long-term challenges: structural integrity, seismic activity, landslides, sediment buildup, water pollution, ecosystem damage, and social displacement. It operates as the centerpiece of a vast, integrated dam system aimed at flood control, hydropower production, and navigation support. While the cascade has demonstrably reduced flood impacts, it comes with a high environmental, geological, and society issues.    How Power is Generated and Transmitted from Dams: Water Flow & Turbines: The dam holds back a reservoir of water. When water is released from the reservoir, it flows through intake tunnels or penstocks (large pipes) down to turbines. The force of flowing water spins the turbines. Turbines Drive Generators: Each turbine is connected to an electrical generator. As the turbine spins, it turns the generator rotor, converting mechanical energy into electrical energy via electromagnetic induction. Powerhouse / Power Station: The powerhouse is the facility built at the dam where turbines and generators are housed. The electricity generated here is typically at a medium voltage (e.g., 11kV to 33kV). Step-Up Transformers: Near the powerhouse, transformers step up (increase) the voltage to a higher transmission voltage (e.g., 69kV, 138kV, or higher). Higher voltage reduces energy loss when electricity is sent over long distances. Transmission Lines: The high-voltage electricity is carried away from the dam via overhead or underground transmission lines. These lines connect to the regional or national electric grid. Substations and Step-Down Transformers: Near populated areas or industrial users, substations reduce voltage to safer levels for distribution. Distribution lines then deliver the power to homes, businesses, and industries. Summary: The dam's powerhouse is the actual power station where mechanical energy from flowing water becomes electrical energy. The power generated there is stepped up by transformers to high voltages for transmission. High-voltage power lines carry electricity from the dam's power station to substations and eventually to end users. The disaster in Texas is severe flash flooding along the Guadalupe River in central Texas, not a dam collapse. Here's the detailed situation:  What is the same? North Carolina had a dam overflow. Texas - also near a dam. China is now in a disaster zone from rain and DAMs in the area. Dams are sitting time bombs; they have a long history. What happens is quite simple, they create a lot of rain, the dams get full, and WHOOPS they have to release the excess water, flooding out people and things in the path.  REPORT: DAMS, FLASH FLOODS & WEATHER MODIFICATION CONNECTIONS  Event: July 2025 Texas Flood Disaster  Dams on the Upper Guadalupe River Canyon Dam / Canyon Lake Type: Rolled-earth flood-control dam with hydroelectric capacity Construction: 1958–1964; lake filled to conservation level by 1968 Ingram Dam Type: Low-head spillway dam (earth-fill, ~20 ft high) Construction date: Not specified, but in place by the 2000s (has monitoring records from at least 2008) gvlakes.com Kerrville Lake Dam (Center Point Lake Dam) Type: Earth dam (~20 ft high) Built: 1956 Kerrville Ponding Dam Type: Rock/soil dam (~35 ft high) with outlet gates Built: 1980 Dams on the Lower Guadalupe River (GBRA-managed Hydroelectric Reservoirs) (All transferred to GBRA management in 1963; dams built 1928–1932) Lake McQueeney Dam Built: 1927–1928 Type: Hydroelectric reservoir dam Lake Placid Dam Meadow Lake Dam (Lake Nolte) Constructed: 1931 Type: Hydroelectric reservoir dam. Lake Wood Dam Built: 1931 Type: Hydroelectric reservoir dam. Lake Gonzales Dam Built: 1928–1932 (exact year unspecified) Lake Dunlap Dam Built: 1928–1932 (same period) Additional Historic Dam Saffold Dam (Max Starcke Dam) – Seguin Built: originally ~1853 (natural outcropping), expanded in 1938 during park development Purpose: Mill and early hydroelectric power.   Summary Table Dam Name Location Built Type Canyon Dam Above New Braunfels 1958–1964 Flood-control rolled-earth Ingram Dam Near Kerrville Pre-2000s Low-head spillway Kerrville Lake Dam Near Kerrville 1956 Earth dam Kerrville Ponding Dam Near Kerrville 1980 Rock/soil with outlet gates Lake McQueeney Dam West of Seguin 1927–1928 Hydroelectric reservoir Lake Placid Dam Near Seguin 1928 Hydroelectric reservoir Meadow Lake Dam (Lake Nolte) Near Seguin 1931 Hydroelectric reservoir Lake Wood Dam Gonzales County 1931 Hydroelectric reservoir Lake Gonzales Dam Guadalupe County 1928–1932 Hydroelectric reservoir Lake Dunlap Dam Guadalupe County 1928–1932 Hydroelectric reservoir Saffold Dam (Seguin) Seguin 1853/1938 Historic mill & hydro dam   Section 1: Overview – Texas Hill Country Flash Flood  Location: Kerr County, Texas (Hunt to Kerrville, along the Guadalupe River) Date: July 3–4, 2025 Primary Event:  A stalled storm system dumped up to 15 inches of rain over the Hill Country in just a few hours.  The Guadalupe River surged over 20 feet in under 2 hours, cresting at near-record heights of 29 feet at Hunt.  Flash flood emergency issued by the National Weather Service at ~4:00 a.m. on July 4.  Impact:  Widespread devastation downstream, especially at summer camps like Camp Mystic.  At least 78 people dead, including many children; over 40 missing.  Key Point: This was not a dam collapse, but rather extreme flash flooding triggered by a high-volume rain event.  Section 2: Dams in the Kerrville/Ingram Region  Major Dams Involved or Nearby:  Canyon Dam (Creates Canyon Lake)  Type: Large rolled-earth flood-control dam  Built: 1958–1964 by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers  Function: Flood control, water supply, hydroelectricity, recreation    July 2025 Status:  Lake rose ~10 ft to 888 ft (well below spillway threshold of 909 ft)  No uncontrolled overflow  Controlled releases were initiated around July 5–6 to manage lake elevation  Ingram Dam  Type: Small, low-head, 20-foot earth dam near Kerrville  Status:  Overtopped on July 4 — water flowed over the top due to heavy rainfall  No structural breach  No intentional release — a passive overflow, not a failure  Did contribute to downstream surge  Kerrville Lake Dam (Center Point Lake Dam)  Earth dam, ~20 feet high, built in 1956  For flood control and recreation  Not implicated in failure  Kerrville Ponding Dam  Small, 35-foot-high rock/soil dam with outlet gates  Built in 1980  For irrigation and water supply  Other Dams Downstream (Managed by GBRA)  These are hydroelectric, recreational, and minor flood-control structures:  Lake Dunlap (failed in 2019, rebuilt by 2023)  Lake McQueeney  Lake Placid  Meadow Lake  Section 3: Dam Performance – Key Timeline & Facts  Canyon Dam (Main Flood Control Dam)  July 4–5: Lake rose 6–10 ft due to rain; reached 883–888 ft  July 5–6: Controlled outflow released (~72.6–106 cfs)  Purpose: Prevent spillover by lowering pressure on the dam  Result: Helped manage flood risk, did not cause flood  Last spillway overflow event: July 2002  Ingram Dam (Low-Head Structure)  July 4, 2025 ~4:00 a.m.: Overtopped due to flash flood surge  Status: Remained intact  No gates opened; no breach  Effect: Sudden overflow contributed to surge toward Kerrville and Hunt  Section 4: What Caused the Flood?  Main Cause:  A stalled storm dumped 10–15 inches of rain in hours  Upstream creeks and tributaries overflowed into the Guadalupe River  River levels rose 26–29 ft in a flash flood event, overwhelming all local infrastructure  Not Caused By:  No dam breached  No dam released water intentionally to cause harm  Controlled release from Canyon Dam was minor in comparison to rainfall totals  Misconceptions Addressed:  Social media rumors falsely blamed intentional dam releases Authorities confirmed no gates were opened at Ingram Canyon Dam functioned as designed, helping prevent even worse damage   Section 5: Summary Verdict on Dams  Canyon Dam: No breach, no overflow. Released small, controlled outflows. Performed well.  Ingram Dam: Overtopped due to rain but did not structurally fail.  Flood Cause: Extreme rainfall, not dam malfunction or manipulation.    Section 6: Global Context – Dam Risks in China  Three Gorges Dam: Major Structural & Environmental Issues  Risk Category  Details  Cracks Detected  80+ hairline cracks after initial reservoir filling (2003)  Seismic Risk  Built near active faults; linked to reservoir-induced earthquakes  Landslides & Bank Erosion  4,600+ landslides in first 11 months after filling  Sedimentation  Massive sediment buildup reduces capacity, degrades water quality  Ecosystem Decline  Fish migration blocked; several species extinct  Social Cost  1.1–1.4 million displaced; 1,300 archaeological sites submerged  How It Works with Other Dams:  Part of a 47-dam coordinated cascade along the Yangtze and tributaries  Works with: Gezhouba, Xiangjiaba, Baihetan, Wudongde, Xiluodu, etc.  Joint Strategy: Flood control, hydropower, sediment management, navigation  2020 Floods: Reduced peak flows by ~30%, avoiding greater disaster    Section 7: Global Pattern – Dam-Driven Flood Complexity  Observations:  North Carolina: Recent dam overflow incident  China: Major dam zone hit by extreme rain  Texas: Flash flooding near multiple dams  Pattern:  Excessive rainfall (natural or possibly engineered) fills reservoirs  When water must be released or overtops spillways, it creates destructive downstream surges  Dams are both flood-control assets and potential amplifiers of disaster when overwhelmed    Section 8: Weather Modification Patents (Historical)  A long list of official U.S. weather modification patents exists, dating back to the 19th century:  Year  Patent #  Title  1891  US462795A  Method of producing rainfall  1920  US1338343A  Artificial fog/mist production  1946  US2395827A  Airplane spray unit (U.S. Dept. of Agriculture)  1951  US2550324A  Process for controlling weather  1952  US2582678A  Disseminating material from aircraft  1964  US3126155A  Silver iodide cloud seeding generator  1969  US3429507A  Rainmaker  2001  US20030085296A1  Hurricane and tornado control device  …and many more spanning fog dispersal, chemtrails, cloud seeding, and atmospheric manipulation.        Conclusion  The July 2025 flood in Texas was not caused by dam failure or intentional release, but by record rainfall in a flood-prone region.  Canyon Dam and Ingram Dam remained intact; the latter was overtopped passively.  A pattern of extreme rain near dams worldwide (Texas, North Carolina, China) has raised serious questions about how these systems interact with both natural and possibly manipulated weather phenomena.  The presence of weather modification patents supports further inquiry into whether some rainfall events may be amplified by artificial means.    Weather Modification Patents  YEAR - PATENT NUMBER - PATENT NAME  1891 – US462795A – method of producing rainfall  1914 – US1103490A – rain maker (balloon images)  1917 – US1225521A – protection from poisonous gas in warfare  1920 – US1338343A – process and apparatus for the production of intense artificial clouds, fogs, or mists  1924 – US1512783A – composition for dispelling fogs  1927 – US1619183A – process of producing smoke clouds from moving aircraft  1928 – US1665267A – process of producting artificial fogs  1932 – US1892132A – atomizing attachment for airplane engine exhausts  1933 – US1928963A – electrical system and method (for spraying chemtrails)  1934 – US1957075A – airplane spray equipment  1936 – US2045865A – skywriting apparatus  1936 – US2052626A – method of dispelling fog (mit)  1937 – US2068987A – process of dissipating fog  1939 – US2160900A – method for vapor clearing  1941 – US2232728A – method and composition for dispelling vapors  1941 – US2257360A – desensitized pentaerythritol tetranitrate explosive  1946 – US2395827A – airplane spray unit (us. dept. of agriculture)  1946 – US2409201A – smoke-producing mixture  1949 – US2476171A – smoke screen generator  1949 – US2480967A – aerial discharge device  1950 – US2527230A – method of crystal formation and precipitation  1951 – US2550324A – process for controlling weather  1951 – US2570867A – method of crystal formation and precipitation (general electric)  1952 – US2582678A – material disseminating apparatus for airplanes  1952 – US2591988A – production of tio2 pigments (dupont)  1952 – US2614083A – metal chloride screening smoke mixture  1953 – US2633455A – smoke generator  1954 – US2688069A – steam generator  1955 – US2721495A – method and apparatus for detecting minute crystal forming particles suspended in a gaseous atmosphere (general electric)  1956 – US2730402A – controllable dispersal device  1957 – US2801322A – decomposition chamber for monopropellant fuel  1958 – US2835530A – process for the condensation of atmospheric humidity and dissolution of fog  1959 – US2881335A – generation of electrical fields (haarp – for re-charging clouds!)  1959 – US2903188A – control of tropical cyclone formation  1959 – US2908442A – method for dispersing natural atmospheric fogs and clouds  1960 – US2962450A – fog dispelling composition (see references)  1960 – US2963975A – cloud seeding carbon dioxide bullet  1961 – US2986360A – aerial insecticide dusting device  1962 – US3044911A – propellant system  1962 – US3056556A – method of artificially influencing the weather  1964 – US3120459A – composite incendiary powder containing metal coated oxidizing salts  1964 – US3126155A – silver iodide cloud seeding generator (main commercial ingredient)  1964 – US3127107A – generation of ice-nucleating crystals  1964 – US3131131A – electrostatic mixing in microbial conversions  1965 – US3174150A – self-focusing antenna system (haarp)  1966 – US3257801A – pyrotechnic composition comprising solid oxidizer, boron and aluminum additive and binder  1966 – US3234357A – electrically heated smoke producing device  1966 – US3274035A – metallic composition for production of hydroscopic smoke  1967 – US3300721A – means for communication through a layer of ionized gases (haarp)  1967 – US3313487A – cloud seeding apparatus  1967 – US3338476A – heating device for use with aerosol containers  1968 – US3410489A – automatically adjustable airfoil spray system with pump  1969 – US3429507A – rainmaker  1969 – US3430533A – aircraft dispensor pod having self-sealing ejection tubes  1969 – US3432208A – fluidized particle dispenser (us air force)  1969 – US3437502A – titanium dioxide pigment coated with silica and aluminum (dupont)  1969 – US3441214A – method and apparatus for seeding clouds  2001 -US20030085296A1 - Hurricane and tornado control device