Skip to content
The 3-3-3 Body Problem episode artwork

Jun 7, 2024 1 hr 8 min

The 3-3-3 Body Problem

from Advisory Opinions Hosted by The Dispatch

No Rahimi decision yet … but Sarah and David have the next best thing: math! The two dive into Sarah’s recent POLITICO piece in which she and Dean Jens used data to analyze the Supreme Court. The Agenda: —The three-body problem —Was Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization radical? —Moneyballing the court —“Right to counsel” at the 9th Circuit —Racial discrimination in contracting —Test cases are test cases —Judge Newsom’s “unusual” concurrence —Judge Easterbrook on fonts —The health of the Constitution Show Notes: —Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum —Connelly v. United States —Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe —National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo —Allen v. Milligan —New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen —Creative LLC v. Elenis —Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission —Chief Justice John Roberts’ thoughts on AI —Pacific Legal Foundation Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch’s offerings—including Sarah’s Collision newsletter, weekly livestreams, and other members-only content—click here.

Episode details come from the podcast's RSS feed.

Embed this episode

Ready to play

The 3-3-3 Body Problem

0:00 1:08:54

No transcript yet.

Requests help us decide what to transcribe next.

Frequently asked questions

How long is this episode of Advisory Opinions?

This episode is 1 hour and 8 minutes long.

When was this Advisory Opinions episode published?

This episode was published on June 7, 2024.

Can I download this Advisory Opinions episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.