The Case of David Camm: did he do it?

Despite many advances in forensic science, people are still convicted on the testimony of people who call themselves experts. Some of the testimony and evidence is based on what lawyers and other scientists call junk science. For one man, junk science meant 13 years in prison, before the expert witness was finally debunked.Sponsor:Public Goods: We worked out an exclusive deal just for the TRUE CRIME FAN CLUB podcast listeners. Receive $15 off your first Public Goods order with NO MINIMUM purchase. Just go to Http://publicgoods.com/TCFC or use code TCFC at checkout.Check out the ‘What Was That Like Podcast’:https://whatwasthatlike.com/https://twitter.com/WWTLpodcasthttps://www.facebook.com/groups/whatwasthatlike/Follow us on social media:facebook.com/tcfcpodInstagram: @truecrimefanclubpodtwitter: @tcfcpodEmail: [email protected] & Researched by: Suzy St. JohnContent Editing by Brittney MartinezProduction: Nico at Wetalkofdreams.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/true-crime-cases-w-lanie--3643504/support. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices