The court we can imagine

Courts are often imagined as neutral spaces, but every judgment reflects decisions about whose experiences count.In this concluding episode, human rights lawyer Nani Jansen Reventlow explores how embracing intersectionality could reshape the European Court of Human Rights itself. Contributors to the book “Intersectionality and Human Rights: Reimagining European Court of Human Rights Judgments” discuss the structural limits of current human rights jurisprudence and the possibilities opened by more intersectional approaches.From legal education to institutional culture, the episode considers how human rights are interpreted in European Court of Human Rights judgments today — and imagines how they could be in a not-so-distant future.Episode speakers: Lyn Tjon Soei  Len, Eddie Bruce-Jones, Nawal Mustafa. Edited and scored by Peter Coccoma.Artwork by Tamara-Jade Kaz.Scriptwriting and editorial support: Bianca Ferrari.Produced by ⁠⁠Systemic Justice⁠⁠. Learn more: ⁠⁠https://intersectionalrewrites.org/⁠⁠