The Couture and Cuisine of Remote SCOTUS Arguments

from Cases and Controversies · host Bloomberg Law

The Supreme Court’s first argument session of the October 2020 term is in the books and two of the lawyers who argued in it join the latest episode of Cases and Controversies to share their virtual experiences. Ramzi Kassem of CUNY law school and Sean Marotta of Hogan Lovells recount everything ranging from missing Justice Ginsburg to technical issues to what to eat for breakfast ahead of a pandemic-era remote argument. And Bloomberg Law judiciary reporter Madison Alder joins hosts Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin to break down the latest in the high court confirmation process for Amy Coney Barrett, which appears secure for Republicans before the Nov. 3 elections are decided.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Oct 16, 2020

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

NOW PLAYING

The Couture and Cuisine of Remote SCOTUS Arguments

0:00 34:57

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Cases and Controversies?

This episode is 34 minutes long.

When was this Cases and Controversies episode published?

This episode was published on October 16, 2020.

Can I download this Cases and Controversies episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!