The Juror Who Wouldn't Back Down

Todd returns to the Lindsay Clancy mistrial after three jurors publicly criticized the lone holdout who refused to find her not criminally responsible for killing her children. Drawing on his own experience serving on a jury, he defends the role of independent judgment, reasonable doubt, and unanimous verdicts while questioning the foreperson's apparent rush to complete acquittal forms. Todd argues that professional expertise inside the jury room is not itself evidence, challenges the claim that medication or expert opinion must settle the question of personal responsibility, and warns against surrendering critical thought to doctors, nurses, technocrats, or any other authority.