The Perpetuity Problem: Crest Nicholson Regeneration v Calvert episode artwork

EPISODE · Apr 1, 2026 · 12 MIN

The Perpetuity Problem: Crest Nicholson Regeneration v Calvert

from Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast · host Davitt Jones Bould

How long is too long?In this episode, hosts Richard and Lizzie unpack the High Court decision in Crest Nicholson Regeneration Ltd v Calvert [2026] EWHC 531 (Ch) and what it tells us about the enduring, and often misunderstood, rule against perpetuities.The rule against perpetuities is designed to stop property from being tied up indefinitely. Traditionally, any future interest had to “vest” within a fixed period — often described as a life in being plus 21 years. If there was even a possibility that it wouldn’t, the arrangement could fail altogether.That creates real tension in modern option agreements, a staple of long-term development deals, where buyers secure the right to purchase land years (sometimes decades) into the future, often conditional on planning.Richard explores:how the rule against perpetuities developed, from The Duke of Norfolk's Case (1682) through to modern application; why option agreements have historically sat uncomfortably within that framework; and how the Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009 has reshaped the landscape by effectively removing the rule for options over land.For developers, landowners and advisers, the message is simple: timing, drafting and structure matter, because even historic rules can still have modern consequences.Other cases mentioned:The Duke of Norfolk's Case (1682)Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809Get in touch! Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email [email protected] for information and booking.  This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content. Get in touch!

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Apr 1, 2026

Embed this episode

How long is too long? In this episode, hosts Richard and Lizzie unpack the High Court decision in Crest Nicholson Regeneration Ltd v Calvert [2026] EWHC 531 (Ch) and what it tells us about the enduring, and often misunderstood, rule against perpetuities. The rule against perpetuities is designed to stop property from being tied up indefinitely. Traditionally, any future interest had to “vest” within a fixed period — often described as a life in being plus 21 years. If there was even a possi...

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

The Perpetuity Problem: Crest Nicholson Regeneration v Calvert

0:00 12:14

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast?

This episode is 12 minutes long.

When was this Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on April 1, 2026.

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!