The Quill & Sword | CAAF Chats Ep 32: U.S. v. Ramirez (C.A.A.F 2024)

from The Quill & Sword · host Unknown Author

In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Ramirez. Specifically, we examine when a military judge must allow questions concerning racial bias during voir dire - while discussing voir dire and bias generally. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 20, 2024

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

NOW PLAYING

The Quill & Sword | CAAF Chats Ep 32: U.S. v. Ramirez (C.A.A.F 2024)

0:00 18:24

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The Quill & Sword?

This episode is 18 minutes long.

When was this The Quill & Sword episode published?

This episode was published on March 20, 2024.

Can I download this The Quill & Sword episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!