The Quill & Sword | CAAF Chats Ep 36: In re B.M. (C.A.A.F. 2024)

from The Quill & Sword · host Unknown Author

In this episode of CAAF Chats, we examine CAAF’s latest opinion concerning their jurisdiction to hear appeals brought by crime victims. Specifically, this case clarifies who has standing to appeal a ruling by a military judge. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 27, 2024

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

NOW PLAYING

The Quill & Sword | CAAF Chats Ep 36: In re B.M. (C.A.A.F. 2024)

0:00 26:41

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The Quill & Sword?

This episode is 26 minutes long.

When was this The Quill & Sword episode published?

This episode was published on June 27, 2024.

Can I download this The Quill & Sword episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!