The Screening Dilemma episode artwork

EPISODE · Feb 9, 2024 · 28 MIN

The Screening Dilemma

from Seriously... · host BBC Radio 4

Ronnie Helvy is on his way for a screening test. He's in his sixties and wants an assessment to check for a variety of cancers. He isn't currently displaying any symptoms but is seeking reassurance. His blood will undergo a series of tests in exchange for over a thousand pounds. The outcome might be able to determine whether he is susceptible to cancers that some of his family have died from. It sounds like a good thing. Or is it?Advances in health screening have allowed us to see far into our bodies' future. During the pandemic home testing became an everyday routine. The same technology has helped develop new tools that can sequence our DNA quickly. Simple tests are making the process less intrusive than ever before.These improvements have also seen the development of a number of major national screening programmes. Including Our Future Health and the UK Biobank. Both of these are large scale research studies to help researchers prevent chronic health conditions. They could also inform the NHS on how to implement generalised screening across more of the population.Private health clinics are also offering health check-ups -- tests that could spot future warning signs. Home-testing kits can be ordered from the internet. But what does this information tell us? And is it information we can trust? We look at whether the private industry is acting responsibly when it comes to genetic testing.The BBC's Health Correspondent Matthew Hill finds out whether screening programmes can really help us live both better and longer lives. And he asks: can diagnosing conditions decades before they might affect us cause more harm than good?The promise of diagnosing conditions early is an exciting one. But there are fears among some health professionals that more screening might not be entirely helpful. We take a look at what lessons from the past could tell us about the current surge in screening. And we consider some of the dilemmas it might present us with.Presenter: Matthew Hill Producer: Robbie Wojciechowski Editor: Richard CollingsContributors: Dr Paul Cornes, Oncologist and International Advisor on cancer Prof. Clare Turnbull, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology at the Institute of Cancer Research Helen Wallace, Deputy Director of GeneWatch UK Prof Sir John Bell, Regius Professor of Medicine at the University of Oxford and the UK’s Life Sciences Champion

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Feb 9, 2024

Ronnie Helvy is on his way for a screening test. He's in his sixties and wants an assessment to check for a variety of cancers. He isn't currently displaying any symptoms but is seeking reassurance. His blood will undergo a series of tests in exchange for over a thousand pounds. The outcome might be able to determine whether he is susceptible to cancers that some of his family have died from. It sounds like a good thing. Or is it?Advances in health screening have allowed us to see far into our bodies' future. During the pandemic home testing became an everyday routine. The same technology has helped develop new tools that can sequence our DNA quickly. Simple tests are making the process less intrusive than ever before.These improvements have also seen the development of a number of major national screening programmes. Including Our Future Health and the UK Biobank. Both of these are large scale research studies to help researchers prevent chronic health conditions. They could also inform the NHS on how to implement generalised screening across more of the population.Private health clinics are also offering health check-ups -- tests that could spot future warning signs. Home-testing kits can be ordered from the internet. But what does this information tell us? And is it information we can trust? We look at whether the private industry is acting responsibly when it comes to genetic testing.The BBC's Health Correspondent Matthew Hill finds out whether screening programmes can really help us live both better and longer lives. And he asks: can diagnosing conditions decades before they might affect us cause more harm than good?The promise of diagnosing conditions early is an exciting one. But there are fears among some health professionals that more screening might not be entirely helpful. We take a look at what lessons from the past could tell us about the current surge in screening. And we consider some of the dilemmas it might present us with.Presenter: Matthew Hill Producer: Robbie Wojciechowski Editor: Richard CollingsContributors: Dr Paul Cornes, Oncologist and International Advisor on cancer Prof. Clare Turnbull, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology at the Institute of Cancer Research Helen Wallace, Deputy Director of GeneWatch UK Prof Sir John Bell, Regius Professor of Medicine at the University of Oxford and the UK’s Life Sciences Champion

PodParley-generated summary based on available episode metadata and transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

The Screening Dilemma

0:00 28:43

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

What's The Craic? Paris & Pearls Join Paris & Pearls on the "What's the Craic?" podcast where they let their inner kids run wild and tackle life's biggest challenges with a smile and a giggle. From current events to relationship advice, comedy to personal stories, this dynamic duo brings their unique perspectives to the table for a fresh and fun take on life's ups and downs. So sit back, relax, and get ready for a good laugh as Paris & Pearls show you that serious topics don't have to be taken too seriously. It's all for the craic, after all!" The Health Mastery Café with Dr. Dave Dr. Dave Montgomery Chanel Stephens is a former cardiac intensive care unit (ICU) nurse who is now a part of the Rapid Response Team at Piedmont Hospital (called the STAT team). She gives the unfiltered, authentic story of what it has been like to be truly on the frontlines in the fight against COVID. "I'll never forget this 50 year old, trick-athlete who didn't take COVID seriously..." - Chanel Dance 2 Phonk DSIVMusic Welcome to the surreal.This isn’t just a music video—it’s a headtrip into a world where reality bends, time stutters, and Phonk hits harder than ever. You’re not watching this by accident. You felt the pull. Now you’re here.🎧 Track: Dance 2 Phonk🎥 Visuals: Original edit powered by AI, glitch-core vibes, dream logic pacing🎵 Music by: DSIV Music — royalty-free tracks for your own projects: https://dsivmusic.com🌀 This video is part of a new visual series exploring the outer edges of sound + image. No voiceovers. No fluff. Just feeling.If you’re working on a film, a game, or any project that needs music with teeth, you can use this track for free. Seriously. Not So Bad Podcast mattymc2 Not So Bad: hosted by Patrick Jensen and Matt McLaren, two blind individuals who have unique perspectives on life. Our podcast is not about inspiring others but rather about sharing our experiences and having honest conversations on what it’s like to live with blindness. We approach every subject with humor and a lighthearted attitude, making sure we don’t take ourselves too seriously and remembering that in reality being blind is ’Not So Bad’.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Seriously...?

This episode is 28 minutes long.

When was this Seriously... episode published?

This episode was published on February 9, 2024.

What is this episode about?

Ronnie Helvy is on his way for a screening test. He's in his sixties and wants an assessment to check for a variety of cancers. He isn't currently displaying any symptoms but is seeking reassurance. His blood will undergo a series of tests in...

Can I download this Seriously... episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!