The Takings Clause episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 25, 2021 · 1H 10M

The Takings Clause

from Advisory Opinions · host The Dispatch

On today’s pod, Sarah and David give us an update on the goings on at the Supreme Court, with an in-depth look at a union takings case out West. “A California regulation allows union representatives to meet with farm workers at their work sites for up to three hours a day for as many as 120 days a year,” Sarah explains. “And so the question is: Is this a per se taking under the Fifth Amendment?” After Sarah and David discuss oral arguments for the case, they do a deep dive on a 9th Circuit Second Amendment case, Twitter’s lawsuit against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, and a Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case on the ministerial exception. They wrap things up with some much needed Netflix recommendations and a conversation about D.C. statehood. Show Notes: -Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid and Supreme Court oral arguments. -New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Corlett and Holloway v. Garland. -Twitter, Inc. v. Ken Paxton. -Deweese-Boyd v. Gordon College. -Torres v. Madrid. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 25, 2021

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

The Takings Clause

0:00 1:10:07

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Advisory Opinions?

This episode is 1 hour and 10 minutes long.

When was this Advisory Opinions episode published?

This episode was published on March 25, 2021.

Can I download this Advisory Opinions episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!