Skip to content
The Takings Clause episode artwork

Mar 25, 2021 1 hr 10 min

The Takings Clause

from Advisory Opinions Hosted by The Dispatch

On today’s pod, Sarah and David give us an update on the goings on at the Supreme Court, with an in-depth look at a union takings case out West. “A California regulation allows union representatives to meet with farm workers at their work sites for up to three hours a day for as many as 120 days a year,” Sarah explains. “And so the question is: Is this a per se taking under the Fifth Amendment?” After Sarah and David discuss oral arguments for the case, they do a deep dive on a 9th Circuit Second Amendment case, Twitter’s lawsuit against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, and a Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case on the ministerial exception. They wrap things up with some much needed Netflix recommendations and a conversation about D.C. statehood. Show Notes: -Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid and Supreme Court oral arguments. -New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Corlett and Holloway v. Garland. -Twitter, Inc. v. Ken Paxton. -Deweese-Boyd v. Gordon College. -Torres v. Madrid.

Episode details come from the podcast's RSS feed.

Embed this episode

Ready to play

The Takings Clause

0:00 1:10:07

No transcript yet.

Requests help us decide what to transcribe next.

Frequently asked questions

How long is this episode of Advisory Opinions?

This episode is 1 hour and 10 minutes long.

When was this Advisory Opinions episode published?

This episode was published on March 25, 2021.

Can I download this Advisory Opinions episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.