Three AIs. One Table. Hard Questions.
from Narativ with Zev Shalev (Audio) Hosted by Zev Shalev
For this edition of The AI Council, I gave each model a different reporting assignment: AI accountability, the balance of power between China and the United States, and threats to the upcoming U.S. elections. Then we put their findings to the test together. The strongest moments came when one AI challenged another: When was an intrusion actually detected? Does economic leverage prove military superiority? Where does an allegation end and evidence begin? The technology had its hiccups. This edited half-hour brings the substance forward, tightening the pauses and keeping the questions, disagreements, and admissions of uncertainty. One observation stayed with me: three models agreeing doesn’t make a claim true. The value is in asking better questions—and exposing what we still don’t know. Watch the conversation above, then tell me: Which exchange sharpened your understanding—and what should the council tackle next? Thank you Dannys, 🇨🇦 Natalie Woodn’t 🇨🇦, Mary Jo, Pamela, Richard Bertoldo, and many others for tuning into my live video! Join me for my next live video in the app. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.narativ.org/subscribe
Embed this episode
No transcript yet.